Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

950P - Prognostic and predictive value of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Lorena Arribas

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S599-S628. 10.1016/annonc/annonc277

Authors

L. Arribas1, M. Plana2, M. Sospedra3, N. Vilariño4, M. Taberna5, R. Mesia Nin6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Clinical Nutrition Unit, Institut Català D´Oncologia, 08908 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català D´Oncologia, 08908 - Barcelona/ES
  • 3 Clinical Nutrition Unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 - Barcelona/ES
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, ICO - Institut Català d'Oncologia l'Hospitalet (Hospital Duran i Reynals), 8908 - Hospitalet de Llobregat/ES
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Head And Neck Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospital Duran i Reynals, 08907 - Hospitalet de Llobregat/ES
  • 6 Dev. Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Badalona, 08916 - Badalona/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 950P

Background

SMM has been associated with increased treatment related acute toxicity and complications in several tumour types. However, there is no reported evidence of this association in SCCHN patients treated with ICI. We explored whether low SMM influenced the onset of severe toxicity and prognosis in these patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN treated with ICI and evaluated with CT scan between July 2015 and December 2018. SMM was estimated using a computed tomography scan through cross-sectional image analysis at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). Patients were classified into two groups: low SMM vs non-low SMM using cut-off points previously published. Toxicity was recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03.

Results

65 patients were enrolled; 56 men (86.23%), mean age of 57.7 years (SD 9.38), mainly hypopharynx (n=28; 43.1%). Forty-six (70.8%) patients had low SMM before starting ICI. No significant differences in progression free survival (PFS) were observed between both groups (P= 0.194), although patients with low SMM were more likely to have progressive disease compared to non-low SMM (56.8% vs 47.4%). Among patients with baseline low and non-low SMM, median overall survival was 7.9 and 18 months, respectively. Patients with low SMM also had a worse one-year survival (HR 0.94; 95% CI:0.9, 0.99; P=0.009). Patients who died during the study had a mean baseline SMM 3 cm2/m2 lower than those that were alive at the end of the treatment. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 34 patients (56.7%). No significant difference was observed in the development of toxicity according to SMM at baseline (P=0.616). However, grade 3-4 toxicity was developed in 7 patients, of whom 6 had low baseline SMM.

Conclusions

This preliminary report offers the opportunity to speculate about the negative influence of low baseline SMM and response to ICI. Further research is needed to confirm the role of body composition changes as a predictive biomarker in ICI treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Department of Health of the Government of Catalonia (grant number SLT008/18/00047).

Disclosure

L. Arribas: Honoraria (self): Fresenius-Kabi; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Nutricia; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Nestle Health Care; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ferrer SA. N. Vilariño: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Boehringer; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self): Bristol; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Lilly. M. Taberna Sanz: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Nanobiotics; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb. R. Mesia Nin: Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Nanobiotics; Honoraria (self): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.