Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

253P - Preliminary report on survival outcomes of BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Alejandro Aranda-Gutierrez

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S340-S347. 10.1016/annonc/annonc260

Authors

A. Aranda-Gutierrez1, A.S. Ferrigno1, J.N. Weitzel2, M. Moncada-Madrazo1, A. Gomez-Picos1, A. Castillo-Orozco3, G.I. Magallanes-Garza4, R. Ortiz-Lopez4, C. Villarreal-Garza1, D. Aguilar4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, 66278 - San Pedro Garza Garcia/MX
  • 2 Division Of Clinical Cancer Genomics, City of Hope National Medical Center, 91010 - Duarte/US
  • 3 Department Of Human Genetics, Faculty Of Medicine, McGill University, H3A 0G4 - Montreal/CA
  • 4 Tecnologico De Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, 64710 - Monterrey/MX

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 253P

Background

A substantial proportion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients harbors a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. However, the impact of these mutations on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates remains controversial.

Methods

Medical records of women diagnosed with BC between January 2013 and 2020 in two centers located in Monterrey, Mexico were reviewed. Only stage I-III TNBC patients who had available genetic test results and at least 12 months of follow-up were considered eligible. Fisher’s exact tests were used to evaluate differences between groups based on mutation status. Furthermore, RFS and OS were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, employing the log-rank test for group comparisons.

Results

A total of 279 patients were diagnosed with TNBC, of which 162 (58%) had undergone genetic testing. Of these, 106 patients were considered eligible. Overall, 58 (55%) were negative for germline mutations and 48 (45%) had pathogenic BRCA mutations (36 BRCA1 [34%] and 12 BRCA2 [11%]). The median follow up was 31 months. The estimated 2.5-years RFS was 81.9% (confidence interval [CI] 95% 63.8-91.5%) for BRCA1 carriers, 71.4% (CI95% 33.8-90.1%) for BRCA2 carriers and 73.7% (CI95% 58.8-83.9%) for non-carriers (p>0.05). The estimated 2.5-years OS was 91.2% (CI95% 75.1-97.1%) for BRCA1-mutated, 73.3% (CI95% 24.3-93.4%) for BRCA2-mutated and 77.1% (CI95% 62.3-86.7%) for non-mutated patients (p>0.05). Table: 253P

Relevant clinicopathologic features. Values are shown as n (%)

BRCA1 BRCA2 Non-carriers p
<40 years 26 (72) 6 (50) 32 (55) 0.18
Ductal subtype 31 (86) 10 (83) 54 (93) 0.33
Stage I II III 2 (6) 19 (53) 15 (42) 1 (8) 4 (33) 7 (58) 8 (14) 36 (62) 14 (24) 0.11
Lymph node metastasis 26(72) 10(83) 34(59) 0.20
Bilateral BC 5(14) 0 4(7) 0.35
Platinumuse 9(26) 3(25) 23(42) 0.25
BC recurrence 6(17) 3(25) 13(22) 0.74
Death 3(8) 2(17) 11(19) 0.39

Conclusions

There was a higher prevalence of BRCA2 mutation carriers in our TNBC cohort compared to what has been previously reported in the literature. BRCA1/2 carrier status was not found to be associated with statistically significant differences in RFS or OS at 2.5 years. However, there was a notable difference in OS at 2.5 years between BRCA1 carriers and non-BRCA1 carriers. Longer follow-up is required to determine if the observed survival advantage in BRCA1 carriers is maintained.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.