Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

440P - Phase III randomized trial comparing short-term infusion of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xelox30) with chronomodulated (Xelox30) in patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Mona Nafea

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S409-S461. 10.1016/annonc/annonc270

Authors

M.Q. Nafea, S.H. Mahmoud, N.M. Gado, Z.M. Abdel hafeez, K.K. El-Ghonemy

Author affiliations

  • Clinical Oncology (ascod), Ain Shams University Hospital - Faculty of Clinical Medicine and Radiation Oncology, 11331 - Cairo/EG

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 440P

Background

Approximately 50% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop metastatic disease (mCRC). Oxaliplatin in combination with Capecitabine prolongs survival in patients with mCRC. Chronomodulation might reduce toxicity and improve efficacy of this treatment strategy.

Methods

In this prospective phase III trial, 100 patients were randomized to receive: Arm A (XELOX30) 30 min-infusion of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 plus oral Capecitabine at a total dose of 2000 mg/m2 daily with 50% of the dose in the morning and 50% of the dose in the evening; Arm B (XELOX30 Chrono) oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2 on day 1, as a 30-min infusion between 1 and 3 p.m. Capecitabine: total daily dose of 2000 mg/m2, 20% of the dose between 7 and 9 a.m. and 80% of the dose between 6 and 8 p.m. for 14 days followed by one week rest. Six to eight cycles were recommended unless progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Baseline radiological investigations: CT chest, PA (pelvi-abdominal) every 2 cycles for response assessment, adverse events were graded in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (v4.03, 2010).

Results

An overall objective response was observed in 48 patients (96%) for (XELOX30 Chrono) versus 42 patients (84%) (XELOX30) (P= 0.12%) with non-significant longer time to progression (PFS) for (XELOX30 Chrono) (P=1). No significant differences in the one year OS rates were observed between the two arms (87.5% versus 100%), although marginal significance was observed with P value close to significant level for (XELOX30 Chrono) (P = 0.056). Toxicity assessment showed ≥ grade II neuropathy was significantly more frequent in the XELOX30 group compared to the XELOX30 Chrono group (P= 0.003%). Subgroup analysis of the treatment arms revealed patients who died were significantly younger with more weight loss than those who survived.

Conclusions

The chronomodulated XELOX regimen may reduce overall toxicity and improve efficacy; longer follow up period may be required to confirm these results. A 30-minute infusion of oxaliplatin seems safe and did not increase the severity of peripheral neuropathy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.