Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

772P - Phase Ib/II study of durvalumab plus guadecitabine in advanced clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Yousef Zakharia

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

Y. Zakharia1, Y. Sun2, R. Garje1, E.A. Singer3, M. Joshi4, D.J. Peace5, A. Lee6, A. Alva7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, University of Iowa - Hospital, 52242 - Iowa City/US
  • 2 Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 48109 - Ann Arbor/US
  • 3 Urology And Urologic Oncology, Rutgers cancer Institute of New Jersey, 08901 - new brunswick/US
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey/US
  • 5 Medicine-hematology/oncology, University of Illinois cancer center, 60612 - chicago/US
  • 6 Cancer Research, hoosier cancer research network, 46204 - Indianapolis/US
  • 7 Hematology/oncology, University of Michigan, 48109 - Ann Arbor/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 772P

Background

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy directed at PD1/PDL1 either as monotherapy or in combination with anti-VEGF agents has shown clinical efficacy in advanced ccRCC. However, the benefit is limited to a small group of patients and hence there is an unmet need to improve the clinical outcomes. The chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 in the tumor micro-environment are chemo-attractants for activated NK and Th1 cells and are critical for anti-tumor immunity. Hypermethylation induced silencing of CXCL9/10 signaling is an important tumor immune evasion mechanism. Preclinical studies with the combination of hypomethylating agent and CPIs led to higher levels of CXCL 9/10, reversal of immune evasion, and potent tumor regression. We hypothesized that the combination of guadecitabine plus durvalumab would increase T lymphocyte infiltration & result in antitumor activity.

Methods

This is a single arm, multi-site, phase 1b/2 trial through the Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium of guadecitabine (G) plus durvalumab (D) in 28-day cycles in pts with advanced ccRCC. Phase Ib dose de-escalation portion evaluated the safety of combination at two dose levels of D (level 0: 60 mg/m2 and level -1: 45 mg/m2). The primary endpoints are safety and objective response rate (ORR, CR+PR) by RECIST 1.1.

Results

As of April 2020, six patients were enrolled in the phase Ib portion of the study. Dose limiting toxicity of neutropenia was seen with D at 60 mg/m2. The dose level -1 of G at 45 mg/m2 subcutaneously for 5 days starting day 1 of a 28-day cycle plus D 1500 mg IV on day 8 was deemed safe for phase II evaluation. The ORR in phase Ib was 33.3% (95% CI, 9.7% - 70%). The median PFS and OS were not reached; The 1-yr PFS was 83.3% (95% CI: 58.3%). The incidence of treatment related adverse events (TRAE) of any grade with G was 24.4%, D was 20.1%, and either G or D was 35.4%. The most common grade 3 AE was neutropenia. The other Gr3 AEs noted in one patient each were abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspnea and pneumonitis. No treatment related deaths were seen. One patient discontinued the study due to pneumonitis.

Conclusions

The combination of guadecitabine plus durvalumab in advanced ccRCC is safe with promising antitumor activity in phase Ib participants. The phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing.

Clinical trial identification

Table 1: Baseline phase 1b patient characteristics

Overall
(N=6)

Age (years)

Mean (SD)

62.8 (7.78)

Median [Min, Max]

63.0 [50.0, 72.0]

GENDER

Female

1 (16.7%)

Male

5 (83.3%)

ETHNICITY

Non-Hispanic

6 (100%)

RACE

White

5 (83.3%)

Black or African American

1 (16.7%)

Histology

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Mixed

2 (33.3%)

Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Pure

4 (66.7%)

ECOG

0

4 (66.7%)

1

2 (33.3%)

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

BIG TEN Cancer Research Consortium.

Funding

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP (ESR-16-12275) and Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(EP23).

Disclosure

Y. Zakharia: Advisory/Consultancy: Amgen, Roche Diagnostics, Novartis, Jansen, Eisai, Exelixis, Castle Bioscience, Array, Bayer, Pfizer, Clovis, EMD serono.; Research grant/Funding (institution): Institution clinical trial support from NewLink Genetics, Pfizer, Exelixis, Eisai.; Advisory/Consultancy: Jansen. E.A. Singer: Research grant/Funding (institution): Astellas pharma, Medivation. M. Joshi: Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy: Sanofi. D.J. Peace: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options: Amgen, BMS, Merck & Co. A. Alva: Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; and Merck & Co., Inc.; Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; and Merck & Co., Inc.; Research grant/Funding (institution): Arcus Biosciences; Astellas Pharma US, Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Clovis Oncology; Pfizer, Inc.; Prometheus Biosciences; and Seattle Genetics, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.