Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

791P - Penile cancer in older men: A SEER dataset analysis

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Penile Cancer

Presenters

Maria Bourlon

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

M.T. Bourlon1, H.C. Verduzco-Aguirre1, E. Meyer2, T. Flaig3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hemato-oncology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, 14080 - Ciudad de México/MX
  • 2 School Of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center Anschutz Cancer Pavilion, 80045 - Aurora/US
  • 3 Division Of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center Anschutz Cancer Pavilion, 80045 - Aurora/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 791P

Background

Penile cancer is a rare malignancy with incomplete data to guide therapy. Data regarding outcomes in older men, who tend to be frail, undertreated, and more prone to side effects, are limited.

Methods

Patients with malignant penile tumors diagnosed from 2004 to 2016 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER)-18 dataset. Demographic characteristics, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy data were obtained. Population was analyzed according to age at diagnosis (<65 y vs ≥65 y). We examined univariate associations between age groups with Chi-square analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariable hazard ratios were calculated using Cox regression. P<0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

We included 3784 penile cancer patients, median age was 68 y. 2222 (58.7%) of patients were ≥65 y. Older patients were more likely to be white/non-Hispanic, whereas the proportion of Hispanic patients was higher in younger patients (p<.00001). Patients ≥65 y had a lower proportion of advanced disease (stage III-IV) compared to <65 y (21.6% vs 27.3%, p=0.0007). Older patients were less likely to have received chemotherapy (6.7% vs 14.9%, p<0.0001). There was no difference in use of radiotherapy according to age (7.9% vs 9.3% p=0.11). Five-year survival in the whole population was 54.6%. Median OS in <65 y was not reached (95% CI incalculable) vs 49 m in ≥ 65 y (95% CI 45-53, p <0.0001). OS was different by age groups when stratified by clinical stage at diagnosis. Median OS in <65 was not reached in stages I-III and 13 m in stage IV disease. In ≥65 stage I median OS was not reached, 43 m in stage II, 32 m in stage III and 9 m in stage IV (p<0.0001). Median cancer specific survival (CSS) was not reached in <65 y for stages I-III and 16 m for stage IV; for ≥65, it was not reached in stages I-III and 15 m in stage IV (p <0.0001). Median OS in those who received chemotherapy was lower in older men (21 vs 38 m, p = 0.0063).

Conclusions

Median OS and CSS are lower in older penile cancer patients, factors potentially associated are undertreatment. These data highlight the importance of timely evaluation of clinical signs and symptoms of penile cancer in geriatric populations and the need for novel approaches.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Thomas Flaig.

Funding

University of Colorado.

Disclosure

M.T. Bourlon: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Asofarma; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen. H.C. Verduzco-Aguirre: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS. T. Flaig: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options: Aurora Oncology; Honoraria (self): BN Immuno Therapeutics; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): GTX; Research grant/Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant/Funding (self): Bavarian Nordic; Research grant/Funding (self): Dendreon; Research grant/Funding (self): Janssen Oncology; Research grant/Funding (self): Medivation; Research grant/Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant/Funding (self): Roche/Genetech; Research grant/Funding (self): Exelixis; Research grant/Funding (self): Aragon Pharmaceuticals; Research grant/Funding (self): Sotio; Research grant/Funding (self): Tokai Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (self): AstraZeneca/MedImmune; Research grant/Funding (self): Lilly; Research grant/Funding (self): Astellas Pharma; Research grant/Funding (self): Agensys; Research grant/Funding (self): Seattle Genetics; Research grant/Funding (self): La Roche-Posay; Research grant/Funding (self): Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.