Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

858P - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the GARNET trial in patients (pts) with advanced or recurrent mismatch repair deficient/microsatelite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) endometrial cancer (EC) treated with dostarlimab

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Endometrial Cancer

Presenters

Rebecca Kristeleit

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S551-S589. 10.1016/annonc/annonc276

Authors

R. Kristeleit1, C. Matthews2, A. Redondo3, J. Huang4, L. Eliason4, E. Im5, J. Brown6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Guy’s and St. Thomas Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, SE1 7EH - London/GB
  • 2 Women's Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence/US
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz - IdiPAZ, Madrid/ES
  • 4 Clinical Science, GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham/US
  • 5 Clinical Science, GlaxoSmithKline, 02451 - Waltham/US
  • 6 Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 858P

Background

PROs enable direct measurement of the experiences of pts with cancer related to an intervention. Regulators increasingly use PROs to inform the risks and benefits of new drug candidates, focusing on 3 core concepts: physical functioning (PF), disease-related symptoms (DRS), and symptomatic adverse events (AEs). Dostarlimab is an investigational anti–programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody that has shown activity in pts with advanced dMMR EC (objective response rate, 42%; disease control rate, 58%) and an acceptable safety profile. Here, we report on PROs in pts treated with dostarlimab in the single-arm GARNET trial.

Methods

Pts with recurrent or advanced dMMR/MSI-H EC that progressed on a platinum regimen received 500 mg Q3W*4 of dostarlimab, then 1000 mg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation (DC). PRO assessment, an exploratory endpoint, was measured using the EORTC-QLQ-C30. PROs were collected at baseline (BL), each dose cycle, and after DC. For PF and DRS (pain and fatigue), we conducted multi-item descriptive analyses, including change from BL. For symptomatic AEs and tolerability (nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, tiredness/fatigue), we conducted item-level analyses to understand response distribution and change in response categories from BL: improved, stable, and 1-, 2-, or 3-category worsening.

Results

PRO data were available for 66/104 pts who received ≥1 dose of dostarlimab. Questionnaire compliance was consistent across domains, ranging from 100% at BL to 45% at cycle 7. Pain, fatigue, and PF were maintained above BL starting at cycles 1, 3, and 4, respectively. Symptomatic AEs were experienced by a minority of pts, with <25% and <6% of pts having 1- or ≥2-category worsening, respectively. Improved scores were reported by 6% to 37% of pts.

Conclusions

PROs from the GARNET trial showed that dostarlimab was generally well tolerated and disease-related symptoms were improved or maintained while on treatment. These data, along with the efficacy and safety profile of dostarlimab, support use of dostarlimab in pts with dMMR/MSI-H advanced EC.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02715284.

Editorial acknowledgement

Writing and editorial support, funded by GlaxoSmithKline (Waltham, MA, USA) and coordinated by Johanna C. Bruneau, PhD of GlaxoSmithKline was provided by Nicole Renner, PhD and Anne Cooper of Ashfield Healthcare Communications (Middletown, CT, USA).

Legal entity responsible for the study

GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, USA.

Disclosure

R. Kristeleit: Honoraria (self): Tesaro. C. Matthews: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Institution received reimbursement for costs associated with the study from Tesaro: Tesaro. A. Redondo: Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): PharmaMar; Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant/Funding (institution): Eisai. J. Huang, L. Eliason, E. Im: Full/Part-time employment: GlaxoSmithKline. J. Brown: Honoraria (self): Olympus; Advisory/Consultancy: Caris; Advisory/Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Clovis; Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Genentech.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.