Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1701P - Oncological patients’ perception of infection risks and level of acceptance of protective measures during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Daniela Tregnago

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S934-S973. 10.1016/annonc/annonc289

Authors

D. Tregnago1, S. Zuliani1, I. Zampiva1, M. Casali1, A. Cavaliere1, A. Fumagalli1, S. Merler1, S.T. Riva1, A. Rossi1, F. Zacchi1, E. Zaninotto1, A. Caldart1, S. Casalino1, M. Gaule1, D. Kadrija1, M. Mongillo1, M. Rimondini2, L. Del Piccolo2, M. Milella1, S. Pilotto1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37134 - Verona/IT
  • 2 Department Of Neuroscience, Biomedicine And Movement Science, University of Verona Hospital Trust, 37134 - Verona/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1701P

Background

The health emergency caused by the SarS-Cov-2 pandemic has a strong impact on oncological patients’ (pts) life. The purpose of this study is to explore the emotional impact and pts’ perception experienced who accessed to our Oncology section at University Hospital and Trust of Verona (Italy) regarding these rules.

Methods

An questionnaire was designed by our Psycho-Oncology service and administered to all pts accessing to our outpatient facilities during a 21-days period (April 9th - April 30th, 2020). Two main areas were investigated: i) organizational aspects and ii) awareness about infection risks, protective strategies, and new rules adopted (14 items, plus demographic data). Percentage of relevant answers to questionnaire items are reported with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

Among 241 respondents, fear of accessing hospital facilities and that chemotherapy treatment could increase the infection risk was reported to be quite high or high in 34% (95% CI: 29-41%) and 27% (95% CI: 21-33%), respectively. Awareness of disease-related risks of infection and strategies to reduce them was "very clear" or "fairly clear" [83% (95% CI: 78-88%) and 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), respectively]. Availability of medical personnel to be contacted while not in hospital was perceived as "very high". Almost all pts felt that organizational measures were clearly expressed (98%, 95% CI: 96-100%) and mainly obtained through the information received at the triage (73%, 95% CI: 67-79%). Overall acceptance of these measures was very high (>70%). Of note, the acceptance of phone-based follow-up and visits were perceived as "not very adequate" or "absolutely not adequate" by 17% (95% CI: 12-22 %) and 18% (95% CI: 13-23%) of respondents, respectively.

Conclusions

Herein, we report among the first real-life experiences about oncological pts’ perception of infection risks and their level of acceptance of protective measures during SarS-Cov-2 pandemic. A timely and thoughtful measures adoption, the coordinated efforts of all figures involved in cancer care and an effective communication strategy to share the necessary risks and sacrifices with pts/caregivers, can lead to effective protection of oncological pts.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.