Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1848P - Managing hypersensitivity reactions in Ovarian malignancy – can we re-challenge successfully?

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Alistair Mclaren

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S988-S1017. 10.1016/annonc/annonc291

Authors

A. Mclaren1, D. Cartwright2, P. Roxburgh1, B. Stanley1, J. Brown1, D. Lindsay1, R.M. Glasspool1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, BWSCC - Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre - NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, G12 0YN - Glasgow/GB
  • 2 -, CRUK - Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, G61 1BD - Glasgow/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1848P

Background

Carboplatin and paclitaxel are essential to the management of ovarian malignancy but are associated with high rates of hypersensitivity reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions can limit safe delivery of these drugs, compromising treatment. Management guidelines vary between different UK centres. At the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre in Glasgow, UK, we investigated the incidence, severity and management of reactions occurring in women treated for ovarian cancers in routine practice and implemented new guidelines, which are presented here.

Methods

Patients without ovarian cancer were excluded from retrospective analysis of details of hypersensitivity reactions recorded contemperaneously between April 2019 – January 2020 on excel and chemocare (CIS Oncology, Belfast, UK) by the treating practitioner. Analysis included treatment cycle, causative drug, severity of reaction as per CTCAE v4.0, initial and subsequent management, and whether re-challenge was successfully attempted on that day.

Results

32 reactions occurred to carboplatin (n=17) or paclitaxel (n=15). A majority of reactions were grade 1 (carboplatin 65%, paclitaxel 78%) or grade 2 (carboplatin 35%, paclitaxel 17%). Additional 100mg of hydrocortisone and 10mg Chlorphenamine IV was adequate in all grade 1 reactions to allow completion of that cycle on the same day, and addition of this to future cycles of chemotherapy prevented further reactions. After a grade 2 reaction, only 25% carboplatin and 50% paclitaxel cycles were able to be completed the same day after re-challenge. There was a lack of consistency in subsequent management of grade 2 and grade 3 reactions when administering further cycles.

Conclusions

Grade 1 reactions can be safely re-challenged on the same day after an additional 100mg of IV hydrocortisone and 10mg IV chlorphenamine. However, further reactions after a grade 2 reaction to paclitaxel or carboplatin are not adequately controlled. To achieve consistent management, and enable subsequent evaluation of efficacy, we developed guidelines for management of paclitaxel and carboplatin reactions which will be presented, with evaluation of outcomes following introduction of these guidelines and a protocol for pre-medication prior to subsequent cycles.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.