Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

89P - Machine learning models predict selinexor tolerability and efficacy

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Yuval Artstein

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S274-S302. 10.1016/annonc/annonc266

Authors

Y. Artstein1, C. Walker2, F. Yang1, D. Van Domelen1, D. Borochov1, I. Mercier1, J. Shah3, S. Shacham4, Y. Landesman2, S. Tang1, E. Shacham1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Biostatistics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., 02459 - Newton/US
  • 2 Research And Translational Development, Biology/lab, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., 02459 - Newton/US
  • 3 Executive, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., 02459 - Newton/US
  • 4 President/cso, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., 02459 - Newton/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 89P

Background

Selinexor is a first-in-class oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export that is approved in the US for treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, and has demonstrated anti-cancer activity in patients with other haematological and solid tumor malignancies.

Methods

Diagnostic, demographic and baseline laboratory data from 1,936 cancer patients treated with selinexor on 13 clinical trials were used to predict tolerability (measured by days on selinexor) and best overall response. An integrated machine learning model averaging neural networks, random forests, logistic regression, and gradient boosting was used. To distinguish between predictive markers for selinexor and general prognostic markers, patients enrolled on the BOSTON study treated with selinexor, dexamethasone, and bortezomib (SVd), were compared to patients on the control arm (Vd).

Results

A combined machine learning model for predicting response that tested over 70 variables among selinexor treated patients achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.674. Lower lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), higher hematocrit (HCT) and higher hemoglobin (HGB) were found to have the strongest associations with positive response. In a separate analysis of selinexor tolerability, higher HGB, lower LDH and higher HCT were also the three strongest predictors of longer time on study. When applying these models to the BOSTON study, variable correlations with treatment duration were stronger and more consistent with data from other trials for patients on the SVd arm compared to those on the Vd arm, indicating specificity for predicting tolerance to selinexor (Table). Table: 89P

Comparison of single variable correlations with time on study between two arms of the BOSTON study

Variable (measured at baseline) SVd arm Vd arm Overall correlation in selinexor-treated patients from all trials
hemoglobin 0.14 0.09 0.18
lactate dehydrogenase -0.12 -0.01 -0.18
hematocrit 0.16 0.13 0.17
red blood cell count 0.16 0.10 0.16
albumin 0.25 0.10 0.15
neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio -0.04 -0.19 -0.12
creatine kinase 0.17 0.14 0.11
ECOG performance status -0.06 0.09 -0.11
pulse -0.12 -0.22 -0.11
neutrophil count -0.10 -0.18 -0.10

Conclusions

Lower LDH and higher HCT/HGB may be useful for predicting patients who will respond safely and favorably to selinexor. Our combined models using common lab values that can easily be assessed may help in identifying patients most likely to derive clinical benefit from selinexor treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Karyopharm Therapeutic Inc.

Funding

Karyopharm Therapeutic Inc.

Disclosure

Y. Artstein: Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. C. Walker: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. F. Yang: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. D. Van Domelen: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. D. Borochov: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. I. Mercier: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. J. Shah: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics. S. Shacham: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment, Officer/Board of Directors: Karyopharm Therapeutics. Y. Landesman: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment, Officer/Board of Directors: Karyopharm Therapeutics. S. Tang: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment, Officer/Board of Directors: Karyopharm Therapeutics. E. Shacham: Leadership role, Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Karyopharm Therapeutics.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.