Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

495P - Lack of liver metastases identifies a group of MSS metastatic colorectal cancer with potential benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 targeting

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Marwan Fakih

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S409-S461. 10.1016/annonc/annonc270

Authors

M. Fakih1, J.S. Sandhu1, C. Wang1, J. Ye2, P. Lee2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology And Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 91010 - Duarte/US
  • 2 Immuno-oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 91010 - Duarte/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 495P

Background

Microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) represent 95% of all mCRC cases and are characterized by resistance to PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition. Liver metastatic disease has been associated with decreased responses to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma. However, the impact of metastatic disease to the liver in MSS mCRC on treatment response has not been investigated in the setting of PD-1 or PD-L1 targeting.

Methods

Following IRB approval, we performed a retrospective study to assess the response rate (RR) and progression free survival (PFS) to PD-1 or PD-L1 based therapy in patients with MSS mCRC who progressed following standard chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients were included in the analysis if they received an FDA approved anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 agent, alone or in combination with other investigational agents. Exclusion criteria included concurrent cytotoxic therapy. RR and PFS were determined by RECIST guidelines.

Results

89 patients with refractory MSS mCRC satisfied the inclusion criteria and were evaluable for analysis. 51, 14, 13, and 11 received nivolumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and durvalumab, respectively. 40, 8, 10, 10, 17 received concurrent VEGFR, MEK, CTLA-4, radiation, or other targeted therapies. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: liver metastases (LM) at treatment (n = 51), no-liver metastasis (NLM) at treatment (n = 38), history of liver metastases (HLM) prior to or at treatment (n = 69), no history of liver metastases (NHLM) at any time prior to treatment (n = 20). NLM had superior PFS over LM (4 m vs. 1.5 m; HR = 0.41, p < 0.0001), NHLM had a superior PFS over HLM (4.3 m vs. 1.5 m; HR = 0.41, p <0.0001). PFS rates 4m/6 m were 0%/0% (LM), 55.3%/23.7% (NLM), 10.1%/1.5% (HLM), 70%/40% (NHLM). DCR/RR were 0%/0% (LM), 47.4%/10.5% (NLM), 11.6%/0% (HLM), 50%/20% (NHLM).

Conclusions

MSS mCRC patients with NLM and NHLM derive clinical benefits from checkpoint inhibitors while the presence of liver metastases appears to be prohibitive of benefit. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors should be re-investigated in prospective trials in MSS mCRC without LM.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Fakih: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy: Array; Advisory/Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Guardant360; Research grant/Funding (institution): Astra Zeneca; Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.