Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

211P - Is axillary lymph node dissection necessary in breast cancer patients with mastectomy and false-negative frozen section in sentinel lymph node biopsy?

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Jing Si

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S303-S339. 10.1016/annonc/annonc267

Authors

J. Si

Author affiliations

  • Breast Surgery, First Hospital of Jiaxing, 314000 - Jiaxing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 211P

Background

The IBCSG 23-01 and AMAROS trials both reported that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) did not change survival rates in breast cancer patients with positive nodes detected by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). The aim of this study was to determine whether breast cancer patients with mastectomy and false-negative frozen section in SLNB could forgo ALND.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of node-negative (cN0) patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer treated by mastectomy and SLNB at our institute between January 2011 and December 2015. Patients with false-negative frozen section in SLNB were separated by the following management of axillary lymph node dissection into non-ALND group (non-process or radiation only) and ALND group (with or without radiation).

Results

A total of 212 patients were included, 86 and 126 patients in the non-ALND and ALND group, respectively. The positive rate of non-SLNs was 15.87% (20/126) in the ALND group. In multivariate analysis, we found that patients with larger tumour size (>2cm) (OR 1.989, P=0.030) and multifocal lesions (OR 3.542, P=0.029) tended to receive ALND. The positivity of non-SLNs in the ALND group was associated with SLN macrometastasis (OR 3.551, P=0.043) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 6.158, P=0.003). Also, removing more SLNs (≥3) was related to negativity in non-SLNs in these patients (OR 0.255, P=0.016). After a median follow-up of 55.83 months, the DFS and OS of the two groups were similar (P=0.427 and 0.742). In subgroup analysis, we found that 108 patients who met the inclusion criteria for the IBCSG 23-01 trial had similar DFS and OS between non-ALND and ALND group (P=0.938 and 1.000). The positive rate of non-SLNs was 10.00% (6/60) in the ALND group. In addition, in 130 patients who met the inclusion criteria for the AMAROS trial, whether receiving ALND or radiation only, there was no significant difference in both DFS and OS (P=0.332 and 0.147). The positive rate of non-SLNs was 16.67% (20/120) in the ALND group.

Conclusions

ALND can be carefully omitted in breast cancer patients who have undergone mastectomy and false-negative frozen section in SLNB. SLNB is sufficient in patients who met the inclusion criteria for the IBCSG 23-01 trial, and radiation was as effective as ALND in patients who met the inclusion criteria of the AMAROS trial for both DFS and OS.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.