Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

CN7 - Improved staff ergonomics and time efficiency using surface guided radiotherapy for prostate setup

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Åsa Eriksson

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S1067-S1068. 10.1016/annonc/annonc312

Authors

Å. Eriksson1, M. Jonasson2, M. Jansson1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiotherapy, Oncology, 22241 - Lund/SE
  • 2 Radiation Therapy, Skanes universitetssjukhus - Onkologiska Klinik, 222 41 - Lund/SE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN7

Background

The use of surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) for prostate patients with internal gold markers was investigated in this study. The purpose was to investigate the effects on ergonomics for the oncology nurses using the SGRT system for initial patient setup. Also, the time efficiency was evaluated using an automatic couch shift function.

Methods

A total of 40 prostate patients with gold markers were included, 20 patients using the SGRT system CatalystTM (C-rad Positioning AB, Uppsala, Sweden) for patient setup and 20 reference patients using tattoos’ and laser alignment. At the first treatment fraction, the lateral laser was used to control that the patient was centered on the couch for all patients. For the SGRT patients, a colour map was projected onto the patients’ skin for guidance of posture correction. The calculated couch shift was automatically applied using an auto-couch function. Daily orthogonal kV-images were used for final positioning of the internal gold markers. For comparison purposes, 184 fractions using SGRT, and 192 fractions using laser alignment was included. The staff ergonomics was evaluated using a questionnaire that was sent out to ten oncology nurses.

Results

The result from the questionnaire showed an improvement in the staff ergonomics. Working with the colour map reduced the amount of heavy lifting for patient adjustments. It was reported that the pain in the neck, shoulders, elbow and thumbs was decreased from all the participators. These ergonomic effects were evaluated during a relatively limited time, suggesting that long term use of SGRT could have a great impact on the staff ergonomics. For most treatment fractions, the SGRT system improved the time efficiency compared to laser alignment (Figure 1). However, during the first treatment fraction an increased setup time was observed (median 3 min) due to time for camera optimization and learning the SGRT system.

Conclusions

The treatment staff experienced an ergonomic benefit using the colour map projected onto the patients’ skin. Shorter patient positioning times were observed using SGRT for most treatment sessions. The result of this study led to implementation of the SGRT workflow for all prostate patients with internal markers in our clinic.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Åsa Eriksson, Marie Jonasson, Malin Jansson.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.