Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1706P - Implementing oncology virtual clinics (VC) in response to COVID-19 pandemic: A transformation driven by a crisis

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Nashmia Almutairi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S934-S973. 10.1016/annonc/annonc289

Authors

N. Almutairi, A. Alolayan, M. Alzahrani, A. Algarni, A. Alhadab, A. Hejazi, N. Abdelhafiz, G.E. Gmati, S. Alshehri, M. Alharbi, F. Alhemoudi, A.R. Jazieh

Author affiliations

  • Oncology Dept., King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh, 11426 - Riyadh/SA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1706P

Background

In response to COVID-19 pandemic, we launched VC to minimize hospital visits, decrease exposures to infection and ensure continuity of care to all cancer patients. Our project aimed to assess the value of VC in management of oncology patients and the level of patient and staff satisfaction with it.

Methods

On March 18, 2020, we introduced VC to all specialties at the Oncology Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Medical records were reviewed by the oncologists to identify patients who can be evaluated through VC, those who need to come personally, and those whose appointment can be deferred. Scheduled patients in VC were contacted through locally developed application (EIADATY) or by phone call. Performing laboratory testing near home and shipping medications were done when feasible. We reviewed the data of VC from March 18 to April 30, 2020 including satisfaction results of patients and staff using Likert scale from 1 to 5 with 1 being very dissatisfied and 5 being very satisfied).

Results

A total of 29 clinic sessions/week were established for different oncology services. Out of 1319 scheduled patients, 1152 (87%) answered the call (90% via phone, 5% via application and 5% used both). Of the 149 patients surveyed, their overall satisfaction ( Score>3 out of 5) with punctuality was (92%), physician interaction (90%), duration of visit (90%), medication requesting (91%), medication shipping (79%) and satisfaction with whole experience (92%). Out of 89 involved physicians, 74 (83%) completed the survey with overall satisfaction with booking process (91%), communication tools (77%), and general satisfaction (93%). 93% of physicians believed that patients were satisfied with the experience and 81 % expected to continue VC beyond the pandemic. Survey of 44 support staff (nurses, coordinators, and pharmacists) revealed similar results.

Conclusions

The transition to VC was well accepted by both patients and clinicians. Optimizing the video communication tool and the process of performing pre-visit laboratory and radiology tests closer to patients home and shipping medications are essential for the enhancement of the VC function.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

N. Almutairi: Research grant/Funding (self): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.