Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

739P - Impact of previous nephrectomy on clinical outcome of metastatic renal carcinoma treated with immuno-oncology: A real-world study on behalf of Meet-URO group (MeetUro-7b)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Marco Stellato

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

M. Stellato1, D. Santini2, E. Verzoni3, U. De Giorgi4, C. Casadei5, S. Buti6, M. Maruzzo7, V. Murianni8, A. Sbrana9, G. Di Lorenzo10, C. Anesi11, M. Sorarù12, E. Naglieri13, R. De Vivo14, F. Vignani15, F. Grillone16, C. Mucciarini17, G. Roviello18, S. Pignata19, G. Procopio3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milano/IT
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 128 - Rome/IT
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 - Milan/IT
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 - Meldola/IT
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 - Meldola/IT
  • 6 Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 - Parma/IT
  • 7 Medical Oncology Unit 1, Department Of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV) IRCCS, 35128 - Padova/IT
  • 8 Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 9 Department Of Translational Research And New Technologies In Medicine And Surgery, Unit Of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, 56100 - Pisa/IT
  • 10 Medical Oncology, Ospedale Tortora Pagani, Pagani/IT
  • 11 Department Of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome/IT
  • 12 Oncology Unit, Camposampiero General Hospital, Camposampiero/IT
  • 13 Division Of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori Bari Giovanni Paolo II - IRCCS, Bari/IT
  • 14 Department Of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza/IT
  • 15 Scdu Oncologia, AO Ordine Mauriziano, Torino/IT
  • 16 Uoc Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitario "Mater Domini", Policlinico of Catanzaro, Catanzaro/IT
  • 17 U.o. Medicina Oncologica, Ospedale Ramazzini, Carpi-AUSL Modena, 41015 - Carpi/IT
  • 18 Department Of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Firenze/IT
  • 19 Department Of Urology And Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione “G. Pascale”, 80131 - Napoli/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 739P

Background

The prognostic impact of previous cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) with curative intent in patients (pts) treated with IO is not well defined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of previous nephrectomy in this patient population in a real-world setting.

Methods

Data for 287 eligible pts, with a least one radiological assessment according to the RECIST 1:1 criteria, were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centres. Baseline characteristics, outcome data - including progression-free survival (PFS) and OS - were collected. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare PFS and OS between groups.

Results

195 (68%) pts received IO as second line therapy, 73 (25.4%) as third line and 19 (6.6%) pts as further line. 82 pts (28.6%) were classed as good risk, 176 (61.3%) were intermediate and 29(10.1%) were poor risk according to IMDC risk score. 246 (85.7%) pts underwent nephrectomy (of them, 95 (33.1%) pts had synchronous metastatic disease and underwent CN), while 41(14.2%) pts did not. Nephrectomy was performed before IO treatment. ECOG PS, at the beginning of IO, was 0 for 145 pts (50.5%), 116 (40.4%) had ECOG PS 1 and 26 (9%) had ECOG PS 2. At a median follow up of 24.7 months (mo), at the end of IO treatment 161/287 pts (56%) received mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors whereas 89/287 pts (31%) did not receive further treatment for clinical deterioration. 68/287 pts (23.7%) continued IO beyond progression. Median OS in pts who had previous nephrectomy was 20.9 mo vs 13 mo in pts who did not (HR 0.51; 95%CI 0.308 to 0.845; P=0.0007 for comparison) whereas mPFS was 4.9 mo vs 3.7 mo, respectively (HR 0.78; 95%CI 0.53 to 1.15; P=0.17). In pts with synchronous metastatic disease (136/287) who underwent CN, mOS was 20.5 mo vs 13 mo in metastatic pts who did not (HR 0.51; 95%CI 0.305 to 0.855; P=0.0024 for comparison), whereas mPFS was 4.61 mo vs 3.75 mo, respectively (HR 0.83; 95%CI 0.554 to 1.247; P=0.34).

Conclusions

A previous nephrectomy, including CN, was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS in pts receiving IO therapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

MeetUro network.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

S. Buti: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis. G. Procopio: Advisory/Consultancy: Ipsen,; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.