Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1038P - Impact of metastatic location on immune-checkpoint inhibitors efficacy in patients with different solid tumours

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Madeleine Maugeais

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S645-S671. 10.1016/annonc/annonc279

Authors

M. Maugeais1, J. Peron1, S. Dalle2, M. Duruisseaux3, P. Corbaux1, T. Reverdy1, J. Lopez4, P. Souquet5, D. Maillet1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Lyon Sud Hospital Center, 69495 - Pierre Bénite/FR
  • 2 Demartology Department, Lyon Sud Hospital Center, 69495 - Pierre Benite/FR
  • 3 Respiratory Medicine, Hôpital Louis Pradel-Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500 - Bron/FR
  • 4 Biochemistry And Molecular Biology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69310 - Pierre Benite/FR
  • 5 Thoracic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, 69495 - Pierre Bénite/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1038P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as programmed death (ligand) 1 [PD(L)-1] inhibitors have dramatically improved patient outcomes in different solid tumors such as lung cancer, melanoma or renal cancer. Data regarding the potential role of metastatic location (ML) as predictive factors of ICI efficacy are limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between ML and PD(L)1 inhibitors efficacy in various malignancies.

Methods

Consecutive patients treated with a single anti-PD(L)-1 agent for different solid tumors from January 2012 to October 2018 were included in a large retrospective multicentric cohort (IMMUCARE). The primary objective was to assess the impact of ML number and ML types (liver vs lung vs brain vs bone) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The impact of ML number was assessed using the threshold of 3 ML. OS and PFS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in survival times were compared using standard log-rank tests.

Results

In this cohort of 759 patients, the primary tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 537, 71%), melanoma (n= 144, 19%) or urologic cancer (n = 78, 10%). Median age was 66 years (19 – 94), 192 patients (26%) had performance status ≥ 2 and 205 patients (27%) had received ≥ 3 lines in metastatic setting. At time of ICI initiation, 261 patients (34%) had at least three ML and 498 patients (66%) had less than three ML, 389 of whom (51%) had only one ML. Patients with at least 3 ML had a shorter median PFS of 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.2 months) compared with 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.6-5.6 months) of patients with less than 3 ML (P<0,0026). The median OS of patients with at least 3ML was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8 months) compared with 13.2 months (95% CI, 11.6-15.3 months) of patients with less than 3 ML (P<0.0001). These outcomes were confirmed in both lung cancer and melanoma cohorts. ML types (brain, lung, liver or bone) did not impact PFS or OS in the cohort of patients with only one ML.

Conclusions

In this pooled multi-institutional cohort, the presence of more than 3 ML was associated with poorer survival outcomes across different solid tumors treated with anti-PD(L)-1 monotherapy. However ML types did not impact patient outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

S. Dalle: Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Non-remunerated activity/ies: BMS; Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Non-remunerated activity/ies: MSD; Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Novartis; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Regeneron; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Sanofi. M. Duruisseaux: Honoraria (self), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Roche; Honoraria (self), Non-remunerated activity/ies: BMS; Honoraria (self), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Pfizer; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Nanostring; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): AbbVie; Honoraria (self), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Takeda; Honoraria (self), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Boehringer Ingelheim; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Blueprint. P-J. Souquet: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Non-remunerated activity/ies: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Non-remunerated activity/ies: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Non-remunerated activity/ies: BMS; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Non-remunerated activity/ies: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Non-remunerated activity/ies: Novartis; Leadership role: IFCT. D. Maillet: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.