Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

239P - Impact of clinical characteristics, patients' perception of treatment goals and endocrine therapy history on HRQOL in HR+, HER2- early stage breast cancer patients

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Rhys Williams

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S303-S339. 10.1016/annonc/annonc267

Authors

R. Williams1, J. Brown2, A. Rider1, R. Wild1, E. Clayton1, M. Method3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Adelphi Real World - Adelphi Group, SK10 5JB - Bollington/GB
  • 2 Gporwe Oncology, Eli Lilly and Company, GU20 6PH - Windlesham/GB
  • 3 Gporwe, Eli Lilly and Company, 46285 - Indianapolis/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 239P

Background

Among patients [pts] with early-stage HR+, HER2- breast cancer [BC], this study aimed to measure associations of clinical characteristics, pts’ perception of treatment [tx] goals and endocrine therapy [ET] history on pts’ health-related quality of life [HRQoL].

Methods

A multinational (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan and US) survey of pts diagnosed [dx] with stage I-III HR+, HER2- BC was conducted from June to October 2019. Pts identified by their physician were invited to complete a pen and paper questionnaire that included the FACT-G and questions on awareness of tx goals. Four separate multivariable linear regression analysis were conducted to measure the association between patients’ clinical characteristics and ET history on each of the 4 FACT-G domain scores: Physical Wellbeing [PWB], Social/Family Wellbeing [SWB], Emotional Wellbeing [EWB] and Functional Wellbeing [FWB]. Regression coefficients are reported where p values <0.05. A positive coefficient implies higher HRQoL.

Results

1152 pts were recruited by 320 physicians. PWB (n=1030) score was impacted if pts completed ET ≤6 months and >6 months before data collection (+2.87, +3.16), if BC dx Stage IIIA or IIIB/C (-2.32 and -2.38) and if pts felt goal of their tx was to stop BC from progressing (-3.00). SWB (n=1029) score was impacted if pt currently receiving tamoxifen (+2.02), if BC dx Stage IIIB/C (-2.69) and if pts felt goal of their tx was to prevent BC returning after surgery (+1.19). EWB (n=1033) score was impacted by time since dx (+0.001), if BC dx Stage IIIB/C (-1.87), or if pts felt goal of their tx was to stop BC from progressing (-2.94). FWB (n=1034) score was impacted if pts were older (-0.10), by time since dx (+0.002), if pre/peri-menopausal (-1.76), if BC dx Stage IIA, IIIA or IIIB/C (-2.18, -3.09, -4.07), if pts felt goal of their tx was to stop BC from progressing (-2.65) or increase length of life (-1.16).

Conclusions

The 4 FACT-G HRQoL domain scores were impacted by stage of BC at diagnosis, ET history and pt perception of tx goals. This suggests that earlier diagnosis and positive reinforcement of tx goals could have a positive impact on HRQoL.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Adelphi Real World.

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company.

Disclosure

R. Williams: Honoraria (institution), Eli Lilly have paid Adelphi Real World a fee for conducting this research and drafting this abstract: Eli Lilly and Company. J. Brown: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Eli Lilly and Company. A. Rider: Honoraria (institution), Eli Lilly have paid Adelphi Real World a fee for conducting this research and drafting this abstract: Eli Lilly and Company. R. Wild: Honoraria (institution), Eli Lilly have paid Adelphi Real World a fee for conducting this research and drafting this abstract: Eli Lilly and Company. E. Clayton: Honoraria (institution), Eli Lilly have paid Adelphi Real World a fee for conducting this research and drafting this abstract: Eli Lilly and Company. M. Method: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Eli Lilly and Company.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.