Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1799P - Immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line for extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Thierry Landre

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S974-S987. 10.1016/annonc/annonc290

Authors

T. Landre1, A.K. Chouahnia2, G. Des Guetz3, J. Assié4, C. Chouaid4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Ucog, Hopital René Muret - APHP, 93270 - Sevran/FR
  • 2 Oncology, Hôpital Avicenne, 93009 - Bobigny/FR
  • 3 Oncology, CH Delafontaine, 93009 - St Denis/FR
  • 4 Pneumology, CH Intercommunal de Créteil, 94010 - Créteil/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1799P

Background

Platinum based chemotherapy is the standard of care in first line treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (ES-SCLC). Addition of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy (CT) in this setting is controversial.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing immune checkpoint inhibitor plus CT with CT alone in first line treatment for ES-SCLC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Five eligible phase III studies (IMPOWER 133, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE 604, CHECKMATE 451 and Reck et al 2016) and a randomized phase II (ECOG-ACRIN 5161) included 3609 patients (2382 males, mostly smokers (95%), median age 64 years). Immunotherapy + CT was significantly associated (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) with prolonged OS (0.84 [0.78-0.90]; p < 0.00001) and PFS (0.78 [0.73-0.83]; p < 0.00001). OS benefit was observed with anti-PD-L1 (HR=0.72; p<0.0001), anti-PD-1 (HR=0.80; p<0.001) and anti-CTLA-4 (HR=0.90; p=0.04). There was no statistically difference for ORR (odds ratio 1.14 [0.98-1.33]; p =0.10). Serious grade 3-4 adverse events were more frequent with immunotherapy (odds ratio 1.73 [1.06-2.82]; p =0.03). Latest update of studies results will be presented.

Conclusions

First-line immunotherapy + CT combination appears superior to CT alone for ES-SCLC for OS and PFS and can be consider the new standard of treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

C. Chouaid: Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Bristol Myers Suibb; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre Oncology. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.