Abstract 82O
Background
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful tool to swiftly and comprehensively identify personalized anticancer treatment options. However, in metastatic cancer, the extent to which somatic genomic profiles are preserved between lesions (heterogeneity in space) and over the course of a patient’s anticancer treatment (heterogeneity in time) remains unclear. Clinicians need guidance on the necessity to repeat genomic characterization in patients with cancer in order to efficiently maximize treatment opportunities.
Methods
WGS data was prospectively collected of 497 longitudinally sampled biopsies from 239 metastatic cancer patients with tumours from 21 different primary sites. Biopsies were taken prior to and after various types of systemic treatments. Available clinical data was used to study associations between the evolution of somatic genomic profiles and clinical characteristics.
Results
During the biopsy interval (median 6.4 months, IQR 3.8-9.6 months), there was a statistically significant but modest (median <10%; mean <20%) increase in the number of mutations, copy number alterations, structural variants and indels. Genomic biomarkers for standard-of-care treatments and clinical trial enrolment could be identified in 22% (n=107) and 51% (n=253) of biopsies, respectively. For 99% (n = 247) of the sequential pairs, the second biopsy did not yield new information regarding standard-of-care genomic treatment indications. Out of 355 biomarkers for clinical trial enrolment identified in the first biopsies, 326 (92%) were also present in the subsequent biopsy. For 224 out of 250 (90%) paired biopsies, the second biopsy did not yield additional biomarkers for clinical trial enrolment. Twenty-eight of the 81 (35%) patients treated with targeted or hormonal therapy between the biopsies gained somatic variants within the gene directly targeted by the drug, revealing known and novel resistance mechanisms.
Conclusions
Our data demonstrates that a one-time WGS analysis during the disease course of a patient with metastatic cancer is (i) sufficient for identifying standard-of-care genomic biomarkers, and (ii) supportive of revealing investigational therapeutic targets that remain present at later stages of the disease.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Josephine Nefkens Stichting, Hartwig Medical Foundation, Oncode Institute, Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1928O - Meta-analysis of tumour and T cell intrinsic mechanisms of sensitization to checkpoint inhibition
Presenter: Kevin Litchfield
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1929O - Soluble PD-L1 and circulating CD8+PD1+ and NK cells enclose a highly prognostic and predictive immune effector score in immunotherapy treated NSCLC patients
Presenter: Giulia Mazzaschi
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1930O - Genomic alterations in solid tumours according to ESMO scale for clinical actionability of molecular targets (ESCAT)
Presenter: Patricia Martin Romano
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1189O - Validation of whole genome sequencing in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Kim Monkhorst
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant 1928O and 1929O
Presenter: Daniela Thommen
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A and live discussion
Presenter: Samra Turajlic
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Webcast
Invited Discussant 1930O, 82O, and 1189O
Presenter: Núria López-Bigas
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A and live discussion
Presenter: Samra Turajlic
Session: Proffered Paper - Translational research
Resources:
Webcast