Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1530P - Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus (modified) FOLFIRINOX for palliative first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A propensity score analysis

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Jakob Riedl

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S881-S897. 10.1016/annonc/annonc285

Authors

J.M. Riedl1, F. Posch1, L. Horvath2, A. Gantschnigg3, F. Renneberg4, E. Schwarzenbacher1, F. Moik5, D. Barth1, M. Stotz1, R. Schaberl-Moser1, M. Pichler1, H. Stöger1, R. Greil6, A. Djanani7, K. Schlick4, A. Gerger1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Oncology; Department Of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, 8036 - Graz/AT
  • 2 Department Of Internal Medicine V: Hematology And Oncology,, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 - Innsbruck/AT
  • 3 Department Of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University; Salzburg, 5020 - Salzburg/AT
  • 4 Iiird Medical Department Of Hematology, Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Rheumatology And Infectious Disease, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Paracelsus Medical University; Salzburg, 5020 - Salzburg/AT
  • 5 Clinical Division Of Hematology And Hemostaseology, Department Of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 6 Department Of Internal Medicine Iii With Hematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology And Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 - Salzburg/AT
  • 7 Department Of Internal Medicine I: Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 - Innsbruck/AT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1530P

Background

Gemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel (GN) and (modified) FOLFIRINOX are standard first-line treatment options for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but no randomized head-to-head comparison between these treatments currently exists.

Methods

We thus conducted a propensity score (PS) analysis of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes in a tri-center cohort of PDAC patients treated with either GN or (m)FOLFIRINOX.

Results

Four-hundred-fifty-five patients were included (table). In unadjusted analysis, both OS and PFS were highly similar in the GN group (n=297) and (m)FOLFIRINOX group (n=158). In detail, median-, 1-year, and 2-year OS estimates were 10.1 months, 42%, and 18% in the GN group, as compared to 11.2 months, 45%, and 12% in the (m)FOLFIRINOX group, respectively (log-rank p=0.783). In terms of PFS, median (4.6 vs. 4.8 months), 6-month (40% vs. 43%), and 1-year (9% vs. 9%) estimates were also highly comparable (log-rank p=0.717). However, patients in the (m)FOLFIRINOX group were significantly younger, less comorbid, had a lower prevalence of myocardial infarction, and a better ECOG performance status. These imbalances in confounders were removed by weighting the data with the PS. In PS analysis of survival outcomes, OS and PFS remained comparable between the two treatment groups. In detail, PS-weighted median-, 1-year, and 2-year OS estimates were 10.1 months, 42%, and 18% in the GN group, as compared to 10.1 months, 40%, and 13% in the (m)FOLFIRINOX group (PS-weighted log-rank p=0.449). PS-weighted median (4.6 vs. 4.4 months), 6-month (41% vs. 35%), and 1-year (7% vs. 7%) PFS estimates did again not differ (PS-weighted log-rank p=0.329). Table: 1530P

Baseline characteristics

Variable GN (n=297) (m)FOLFIRINOX (n=158) p
Age (years) 70 [62-74] 63 [53-67] <0.0001
Female sex 123 (41%) 64 (41%) 0.851
Charleson Comorbidity Index 9 [8-10] 8 [7-9] <0.0001
Myocardial infarction 23 (8%) 4 (3%) 0.035
ECOG: 0 87 (30%) 99 (63%) <0.0001
Tumor location: Pancreatic head 175 (61%) 74 (50%) 0.024
Primary palliative setting 242 (81%) 140 (89%) 0.033
Surgery of primary tumor 65 (22%) 18 (11%) 0.006
Prior adjuvant chemotherapy 44 (15%) 14 (9%) 0.085
Tumor extent: Metastatic 231 (78%) 121 (77%) 0.282
CA 19-9 (U/mL) 959 [74-6390] 1555 [135-12278] 0.117

Data are medians [25th-75th percentile] or absolute frequencies (%).

Conclusions

In this propensity score analysis of advanced PDAC patients undergoing 1st-line combination chemotherapy with GN or (m)FOLFIRINOX, OS and PFS did not differ between these two treatments.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

R. Greil: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Celgene. A. Gerger: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Celgene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.