Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1531P - FOLFIRINOX relative dose intensity (RDI) and disease control in advanced pancreatic cancer patients (APC)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Antonin Vary

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S881-S897. 10.1016/annonc/annonc285

Authors

A. Vary1, L. Lebellec2, M. Le Deley3, N. Penel4, C. Cheymol5, E. Rad6, F. El Hajbi7, J. Edeline8, F. Di Fiore9, A. Bimbai3, A. Turpin10

Author affiliations

  • 1 -, Universite de Lille, 59120 - Loos/FR
  • 2 Service D’oncologie Médicale, CH Chatiliez, 59200 - Tourcoing/FR
  • 3 Drci, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 - Lille/FR
  • 4 General Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59020 - Lille/FR
  • 5 Service D’onco-hématologie,, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, 59000 - Lille/FR
  • 6 Oncologie Medicale, CH Roubaix, Roubaix/FR
  • 7 Département D’oncologie Médicale, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59020 - Lille/FR
  • 8 Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugene - Marquis, 35042 - Rennes/FR
  • 9 Département D’oncologie Digestive, CH Rouen, 76000 - Rouen/FR
  • 10 Medical Oncology, Hopital Claude Huriez, 59037 - Lille/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1531P

Background

Most APC patients (pts) treated with FOLFIRINOX experience adverse events requiring dose reductions. Lee et al. have described an association between RDI reduction and lower disease control rate (DCR) in Korean APC pts (Lee, EJC, 2017). We aimed to validate these findings in a European setting.

Methods

We included all consecutive incident APC pts treated with >=3 cycles of FOLFIRINOX, who had at least 1 CT assessment, between 2011 and 2018 in 6 French centres. Imaging was centrally reviewed according to RECIST 1.1. We computed the RDI before 1st evaluation for each component of FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil bolus, 5FUb; 5-fluorouracil infusion, 5FUiv; irinotecan; oxaliplatin), as well as for the combined cumulative RDI (cRDI) of FOLFIRINOX using the modified Hryniuk model (http://www.rdicalc.com). The association between RDI and DCR at 1st evaluation was assessed by multivariate logistic regression models, controlling for clinical factors, number of cycles before evaluation and centre. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the discrimination ability of the models with or without RDI. Same approach was used for response rate (RR).

Results

We included 243 patients: 65 with locally advanced and 178 with metastatic disease. Median RDI was 75%, 85%, 81% and 79% for 5FUb, 5FUiv, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, respectively. Median cRDI was 80%. At 1st evaluation, 49 pts had achieved an objective response (RR=20%) and 131 had a stable disease (DCR=74%). The 1-y PFS and 1-y OS were 36% and 55%, respectively. We confirmed that performance status (1 vs 0) and liver metastases were significantly associated with low DCR. None of the RDI were found significantly associated with DCR (p=0.80, p=0.96, p=0.55, p=0.97, p=0.58, for 5FUb, 5FUiv, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and cRDI, respectively). Including RDI in the model did not improve the ability to predict disease control: AUC=0.79 (95%CI, 0.73 – 0.85) with RDI vs AUC=0.78 (95%CI, 0.72 – 0.85) without. Similar results were observed for RR.

Conclusions

RDI of each FOLFIRINOX’s component and cRDI were neither associated with DCR, nor with RR. Pharmacological data would help interpret this finding.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

GERCOR.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

N. Penel: Honoraria (institution), Research grant/Funding (institution): Bayer; Honoraria (institution), Research grant/Funding (institution): Pharmamar; Honoraria (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (institution): Astellas; Honoraria (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution): Ipsen. F. El Hajbi: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Servier. J. Edeline: Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory/Consultancy: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory/Consultancy: Boston Scientific; Research grant/Funding (institution): Beigene; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Amgen. A. Turpin: Honoraria (self): Servier; Advisory/Consultancy: Mylan; Advisory/Consultancy: Merck Sereno; Advisory/Consultancy: Amgen; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Sanofi; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.