Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

653P - Features of molecular profile of prostate cancer after neoadjuvant treatment

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Mary Berkut

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S507-S549. 10.1016/annonc/annonc275

Authors

M. Berkut1, A. Nosov1, A. Artemyeva2, A. Malek3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncourology Department, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 197758 - Saint-Petersburg/RU
  • 2 Pathology Department, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 197758 - Russia/RU
  • 3 Scientific Laboratory Of Subcellular Technologies, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, 197758 - Saint-Petersburg/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 653P

Background

This abstract presents the molecular profiling of prostate adenocarcinoma after surgical or combination treatment.

Methods

The study included 66 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens of prostate cancer (PCa) (tumor volume at least 75% of the total material volume, without areas of necrosis and hemorrhages): 31 samples were taken after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with docetaxel and degarelix followed by radical prostatectomy (NCHT/RPE group) and the control group (RPE) included 35 samples after only surgery. The microdissection size was from 3 to 20 μm. It was performed by a local pathologist. RNA supernatant was isolated from paraffin sections by dewaxing with mineral oil. RNA supernatant concentration was assessed on a Qubit 2.0 fluorimeter (Invitrogen), protocol #0001987. Profiling of all samples were performed on the miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT(Exiqon) test system with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with SYBR® green on CFX96 Real Time System (“Bio-Rad”) thermocycler, protocol #6.2. In the calculations, a semi-quantitative assessment of the level of miRNA expression was used relative to the average expression level of all samples (ΔΔCt).

Results

The average concentration of RNA supernatant in the NCHT/RPE group was lower than the control group (P=0.002): ΔС=3.77±4.51ng/ml (0.05-1.1) against ΔС (RPE group) = 19.66±15.69 ng/ml (2.88-66.0). Profiling showed differences in PCR cycles (ΔCt>1.5) for miRNA primers: hsa-mir-181a-5p, hsa-mir-126-3p, hsa-mir-200c-3p, hsa-mir-106b-5p, hsa-mir221-3p, hsa-mir34. The ΔΔCt of these miRNAs were different (P>0.05) into groups except miRNA-200c: ΔΔCt=4.75±4.00ed. against 3.34 ± 3.83ed. (P=0.14). The correlation analysis revealed association with ΔΔCt-miRNA126 and the frequency of the positive surgical margin (F= 10.34, P = 0.015). Decreasing ΔΔCt-miRNA126 from 10.82±6.0ed. to 7.37±5.46ed. was noted after neoadjuvant treatment (U-test P=0.012). The equation of the dependence of overall survival (OS) was formulated during regression analysis on the ΔΔCt-miRNA-106b indices: OS=24+ 2.2*MIR106B, which was able to predict OS in 19.2% of patients.

Conclusions

The analysis revealed that overexpression of some miRNAs is blocked in prostate cancer patients receiving combined treatment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.