Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

664P - Efficacy of triptorelin after radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Liping Xie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S507-S549. 10.1016/annonc/annonc275

Authors

L. Xie1, V. Matveev2, A. Houchard3, P. Cabri4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Director Of Urology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, 310007 - Hangzhou/CN
  • 2 N. N. Blokhin Nmrco, N. N. Blokhin NMRCO, Moscow/RU
  • 3 Statistics, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt/FR
  • 4 Ipsen, Ipsen, Boulogne Billancourt/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 664P

Background

Immediate antiandrogen therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) reduces risk of recurrence in patients with positive lymph nodes. Its use in negative lymph nodes is debated. We report data from the PRIORITI study (NCT01753297) on the efficacy of triptorelin, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who had undergone RP but had no evidence of residual disease.

Methods

This phase 4, open-label, randomized, controlled trial included patients in China and Russia with prostate adenocarcinoma. Eligibility criteria are summarized in the table. Patients were randomized to triptorelin (11.25 mg at baseline, 3 and 6 months) or active surveillance (AS). The primary outcome was Biochemical Relapse-Free Survival (BRFS), defined as time from randomization to Biochemical Relapse (BR; increased prostate specific antigen level > 0.2 ng/mL, confirmed by a second measurement 4‒6 weeks later). Efficacy was assessed in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population. A log-rank test (two-sided) was used to compare BRFS between groups. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the Q1 BFRS in each group. Patients with BR and/or clinical disease progression were monitored for 36 months, those without continued to be followed every 3 months. The study ended when 61 BRs were observed.

Results

The ITT population comprised 226 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 65.3 (6.4) years. Baseline characteristics relating to RP were similar in both groups. The median BRFS was not reached. The Q1 BRFS (95% CI) was 39.1 months (29.9, not estimated) with triptorelin versus 30.0 months (18.6, 42.1) with AS (p=0.159). No specific safety issues were observed. Table: 664P

Eligibility criteria

Key inclusion criteria
Aged ≥ 18 years Histo-pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate Undergone RP ≤ 8 weeks prior to randomization Post-RP PSA levels ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at 6 weeks High risk of disease progression, defined as a: • Gleason score ≥ 8 on prostatectomy specimen, and/orGleason score ≥ 8 on prostatectomy specimen, and/or • pre-RP PSA level ≥ 20 ng/mL, and/or • primary tumour stage 3a ECOG performance status of 0 to 1
Key exclusion criteria
Evidence of lymph node or distant metastasis Positive surgical margins Evidence of other malignant disease not treated with a curative intent Surgical castration

PSA, prostate specific antigen; RP, radical prostatectomy.

Conclusions

In high-risk patients without evidence of residual disease following RP, BRFS was longer with triptorelin than with AS, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01753297.

Editorial acknowledgement

Dr David Gothard of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK, provided medical writing and editorial support, which was sponsored by Ipsen.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Ipsen.

Funding

Ipsen.

Disclosure

V. Matveev: Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen. A. Houchard: Full/Part-time employment: Ipsen. P. Cabri: Full/Part-time employment: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.