Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral - Haematological malignancies

888MO - Effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

18 Sep 2020

Session

Mini Oral - Haematological malignancies

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Lymphomas

Presenters

Bastian von Tresckow

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S590-S598. 10.1016/annonc/annonc261

Authors

B. von Tresckow1, A. Bergamasco2, F. Trinchese3, F. Gavini4, N. Bent-Ennakhil5, A. Zomas3, G. Castillon6, T. Arredondo-Bisono7, T. Cristarella6, Y. Moride8, W.J. Plattel9

Author affiliations

  • 1 Clinic For Hematology And Stem Cell Transplantation And Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Essen, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 - Essen/DE
  • 2 Pharmacoepidemiology, YOLARX Consultants, 75006 - Paris/FR
  • 3 Global Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical International AG, 8152 - Zurich/CH
  • 4 Eucan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical International AG, 8152 - Glattpark (Opfikon)/CH
  • 5 Eucan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical International AG, 8152 - Zurich/CH
  • 6 Pharmacoepidemiology, YOLARX Consultants Inc., H3W 1Y7 - Montreal/CA
  • 7 Biostatistics, YOLARX Consultants, 75006 - Paris/FR
  • 8 Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, H3C3J7 - Montreal/CA
  • 9 Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 - Groningen/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 888MO

Background

Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody drug conjugate, was shown to be effective and well-tolerated in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (RRcHL) according to a pivotal phase II trial. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of BV in RRcHL in the real-world.

Methods

Systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis based on literature (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science), pragmatic searches and snowballing (01/01/2010 – 06/02/2020). Data of interest were patterns of BV use, treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Statistical heterogeneity assessed through I2 statistics. Estimates pooled using a random effects model. Primary analysis included only studies of good methodological quality. Publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot. Sensitivity analyses included studies of moderate quality and estimates reported in abstracts.

Results

The literature search yielded 2,460 references and pragmatic searches found 21 additional ones. Upon abstract screening and in-depth review, eligibility was confirmed for 32 sources. In 26 sources, the dosing regimen of BV in RRcHL was 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Median number of cycles administered ranged from 4 to 8, uniformly distributed across studies. In real-world environment, the overall response rate (ORR) to BV based on the revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma ranged from 46.6% to 84.0% (28 sources) with 21.1% to 45.8% patients achieving complete response (26 sources). After 4 cycles, pooled estimate of ORR was 62.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.0 - 68.9; I2 = 9.5%) while after 4-6 cycles, it was 66.7% (95% CI: 58.5 - 74.5; I2 = 43.9%). Similar results were found in sensitivity analyses. The 1-year, 2-year and 5-year PFS ranged from 52.1% to 63.2% (2 sources), 45.2% to 56.2% (3 sources) and 31.9% to 33.0% (2 sources), respectively. The 1-year, 2-year and 5-year OS ranged from 68.2% to 82.7% (6 sources), 58.0% to 81.9% (7 sources) and 58.0% to 62.0% (2 sources), respectively.

Conclusions

The present study corroborates the effectiveness of BV in RRcHL patients managed in the real-world setting by showing results which are consistent with those of the pivotal phase II trial.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Funding

Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Disclosure

B. von Tresckow: Advisory/Consultancy, Personal fees: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Personal fees: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Personal fees and Non-financial support: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, Personal fees: Gilead; Advisory/Consultancy, Personal fees: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Personal fees and Non-financial support: Takeda pharmaceuticals; Research grant/Funding (self), Non-financial support: Novartis. A. Bergamasco, G. Castillon, T. Arredondo-Bisono, T. Cristarella, Y. Moride: Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda Pharmaceuticals. F. Trinchese. F. Gavini, N. Bent-Ennakhil, A. Zomas: Full/Part-time employment: Takeda Pharmaceuticals. W.J. Plattel: Advisory/Consultancy: Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy: MSD.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.