Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1595P - Connecting primary care with oncology through the implementation a cancer fast-track program: Reducing time from initial symptoms to diagnosis and initiation of treatment. A ten-year assessment

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Presenters

Maria Teresa Martinez

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S903-S913. 10.1016/annonc/annonc287

Authors

M.T.M. Martinez1, B. Ortega1, S. Simon1, S. Moragon1, J. Navarro2, A. Sanmartin2, A. Lluch1, A. Cervantes1, I. Chirivella Gonzalez1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 - Valencia/ES
  • 2 Management Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 - Valencia/ES
More

Resources

Abstract 1595P

Background

Cancer is the second leading cause of mortality worldwide. Integrating different levels of care by implementing screening programs, extending diagnostic tools and applying therapeutic advances may increase survival. We implemented a cancer fast-track program (CFP) to reduce time from suspected cancer symptoms to confirmation of diagnosis and start of therapy.

Methods

A descriptive data sample of ten years since implementation of the CFP (2009–2019) were collected at the Clinico-Malvarrosa Health Department in Valencia, Spain. Aiming to shorten time between suspected cancer cases and diagnosis, primary care (PC) physicians, an oncology coordinator and eleven specialists designed guidelines for PC physicians to refer patients through the CFP. Recommendations stablished in the guides included some for potential breast, colorectal, cervical, lung, bladder, dermatological, head and neck and soft tissue cancers. Patients with enlarged lymph nodes and constitutional symptoms were also considered. When the PC physician identified patients with suspected cancer, a proposal was sent for further review to the oncology coordinator. If recommendations were met, a quick appointment was made to attend the patient. We analysed the time lapse between each stage of the process during a ten year follow up.

Results

A total of 4574 suspected cancer cases were submitted to the CFP; 4405 were seen by the corresponding specialist. In 1102 (25%) cases, cancer was confirmed. Among these, breast cancer was found in 29%; urological 21%; colorectal 17%; and lung cancer 14%. The median time from submission of a proposal to the specialist assessment was 15 days (1-136); 3 days (1-242) to pathological diagnosis and 34 days (1-333) to treatment. In 832/1102 (74.5%) treatment intention was curative.

Conclusions

Interval between patient referral by the PC physician to the specialist, diagnosis of cancer and start of therapy can be reduced. The implementation of CFT allowed most patients to begin curative intended therapy. Our implemented CFP requires a limited amount of resources.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings