Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

726P - Collecting duct and renal medullary carcinoma: A population based analysis

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Jeffrey Graham

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

J. Graham1, A. Li1, A. Pareek1, M. Kim1, M. Leveridge2, C. Doiron1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 02115 - Boston/US
  • 2 Urology, Queen's University, K7L 2V7 - Kingston/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 726P

Background

Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) and renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) are two rare and aggressive subtypes of kidney cancer that share a similar anatomic origin in the distal nephron. Due to their rarity, there is limited data on their epidemiology and outcomes. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to describe the epidemiologic characteristics of these tumor and to provide contemporary prognostic information.

Methods

Using the SEER database, we conducted a retrospective analysis of all cases of CDC and RMC diagnosed between 2004-2015. We collected data on key demographic and tumor characteristics, including age, sex, race, stage, as well as treatment modalities. The primary endpoints were cancer specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). We used Kaplan-Meier survival estimates to compare outcomes by histology and cox proportional hazard models to adjust for prognostic variables.

Results

We identified 273 cases of CDC and 74 cases of RMC. Patients with RMC were more likely to be younger (mean age 27.4 years vs 59.1 years, p<0.001) and of African-American ethnicity (81.1 % vs 23.1%, p<0.001). Compared with CDC, RMC was associated with more advanced disease at diagnosis, with 74.8% presenting with stage IV disease vs. 48.4% (p<0.001). RMC was also more likely to have regional lymph node metastases (60.8% vs. 38.1%, p<0.001) and distant metastases at diagnosis (75.7% vs. 38.3%, p<0.01). Surgery was more common in the CDC group (83.8% vs. 65.8%, p<0.001). Patients with RMC were more likely to receive chemotherapy (28.9% vs. 67.6%, p<0.001). The median OS in CDC was 19 months vs. 9 months in RMC. After controlling for age, sex, race, and stage, RMC was associated with significantly worse survival compared to CDC (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.09-2.66, p=0.02).

Conclusions

Despite recent therapeutic advances in other subtypes of kidney cancer, the prognosis of CDC and RMC remains poor. Compared to CDC, RMC is associated with a particular poor prognosis with a median OS of less than one year. Further research focusing on prevention, early detection, and the development of novel treatment strategies is warranted.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

J. Graham: Advisory/Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen. M. Leveridge: Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy: Abbvie. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.