Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1790P - Clinical utility of ctDNA and CTCs for genomic profiling and monitoring chemotherapy response in patients with small cell lung cancer

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Yu Feng

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S974-S987. 10.1016/annonc/annonc290

Authors

Y. Feng1, X. Hu1, T. Zhang2, L. Zhang2, G. Dong3, M. Yuan4, H. Zhu1, Y. Liu1, P. Xing1, H. Wang1, B. Li5, Y. Shi6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, 100021 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University & Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, 100000 - Beijing/CN
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Department of Medical oncology, The people's hospital of Tangshan City No. 65 Shengli Road, Tangshan City, Heibei, China, 063001 - Tangshan/CN
  • 4 Gene Analysis, Geneplus-Beijing Ltd., 1000000 - Beijing/CN
  • 5 Medical Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, 100000 - Beijing/CN
  • 6 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, 100021 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1790P

Background

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) counts and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) sequencing offer a reliable approach to monitor therapeutic efficacy in multiple solid tumours. This study evaluated the utility of ctDNA and CTCs to monitor efficacy of patients (pts) with SCLC.

Methods

Pts included on the study had histologically or cytologically confirmed SCLC, and received first-line etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy every three weeks for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Pre-treatment tumour biopsy specimens and longitudinal plasma samples were collected to perform next-generation sequencing and calculate the number of CTCs per 6ml peripheral blood. Molecular tumour burden index (mTBI) (in house) was used to reflect the longitudinal changes in overall molecular tumour burden.

Results

Between November 2018 and May 2020, 35 pts were enrolled, median follow-up duration was 10.3 (range 2.7-18) months. PFS was not reached. Investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 74.3% (95% CI, 59.1%-89.5%). Of 26 pts with available baseline tumour and blood samples, 78.2% (241/308) of tissue derived mutations were observed in ctDNA. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (92.3%), RB1 (50.0%) and LRP1B (42.3%) in ctDNA analysis, which were consistent with tissue analysis (96.2%, 53.8% and 38.5%, respectively). LRP1B mutation was more common in extensive stage (ES)-SCLC than in limited stage (LS)-SCLC (85.7% vs 23.5%, P=0.009). Longitudinal plasma samples from 16 pts were analysed, the median mTBI decreased from 8.3 (range 0.66-49.77) at baseline to 0.59 (range 0-1.58) after 2 cycles of treatment, the concordance rate between mTBI and imaging evaluation was 100%. While after 6 cycles of treatment, the median mTBI increased to 0.86 (range 0-32.34) - 8 pts increased and 8 pts kept declining. Six of the increased pts (6/8, 75%) were subsequently verified by imaging, one of the pts whose levels continued to decrease (1/8, 12.5%) had an imaging progressive disease (PD). Changes in CTCs were monitored in 10 pts: the median number of CTCs increased from 8.0 (range 1-22) at baseline to 9.5 (range 3-98) after 2 cycles of treatment, and then declined to 6.5 (range 1-25) after 6 cycles of chemotherapy, which was contrary to the results of the mTBI and imaging.

Conclusions

ctDNA assessment is feasible for genomic profiling, therapy monitoring and early progression detection in SCLC, while assessment of CTCs needs more exploration.

Clinical trial identification

ChiCTR1900023956.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.