Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1543P - Clinical relevance of somatic and germline alterations in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Presenters

Fei Wang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S881-S897. 10.1016/annonc/annonc285

Authors

F. Wang1, Q. Liu1, X. Li2, H. Yuan2, T. Ma2, R. Liu1, Z. Zhao1, X. Zhang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Military Hospital), 100853 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Department Of Translational Medicine, Genetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd, 102206 - Beijing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1543P

Background

Characterization of the genomic alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients can draw a roadmap for precision medicine.

Methods

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed with a 509-gene next generation sequencing (NGS) panel on tumor tissues from a cohort of 339 Chinese PDAC patients. The clinical relevance of germline and somatic mutations, copy number alterations and fusions with a curated list of targetable genes for RAF/MEK/ERK inhibitors, CDK inhibitors, Platinum chemo/PARP inhibitors, PORCN inhibitors, RTK inhibitors, MTOR inhibitors, Bromodomain inhibitors, PI3K/AKT inhibitors, WNT signaling inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, MDM2 inhibitors and SF3b modulator were assessed.

Results

Excluding common mutations in KRAS or CDKN2A, genetic alterations in PDACs were mainly enriched in the Central carbon metabolism in cancer pathway, ErbB signaling pathway, FoxO signaling pathway and VEGF signaling pathway (P<0.0001). Genetic alterations with targeting potential were identified in 33% (112/339) of PDAC patients, and 9% (31/339) of the samples were found to be targetable for two or more types of inhibitors, suggesting a genotype-driven combination therapy opportunity. The top three actionable alterations were ATM (6%), RNF43 (4%) and PIK3CA (4%). Low-prevalence alterations in several genes tractable of other targeted therapies were also observed, including mutations in STK11, FBXW7, MYC, SF3B1, JAK1, JAK3 as well as high-level amplifications of MDM2. There were 9% (31/339) of PDACs harbored germline or somatic mutations in one of the DNA damage repair (DDR) genes BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2. Excluding common events in TP53, the overall mutation rate of all eight DDR pathways was 24% (80/339), among which 6% (20/339) exhibited co-mutations in two or more DDR pathways, suggesting that these tumors may be more amenable to platinum-based chemotherapy or poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition.

Conclusions

We found that beyond KRAS and CDKN2A, 33% and 24% of PDACs may confer better phenotype in combination therapy and DDR-targeted treatment, respectively. These data supported the necessity of deep molecular profiling for PDACs, to identify targets of therapeutic potential.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

X. Li, H. Yuan, T. Ma: Full/Part-time employment: Genetron Health (Beijing) Technology, Co. Ltd. All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.