Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

668P - Clinical factors that are prognostic for survival outcomes in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with radium-223

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Esmail Al-Ezzi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S507-S549. 10.1016/annonc/annonc275

Authors

E.M.M. Al-Ezzi1, H.A. Alqaisi1, M. Iafolla1, S. Sridhar1, A. Sacher1, N. Fallah-Rad1, D.M. Jiang1, C. Catton2, P. Warde2, R. Hamilton3, N. Fleshner3, A. Zlotta3, A. Hansen1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA
  • 2 Department Of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA
  • 3 Division Of Urologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 668P

Background

Radium-223 (Ra-223) improves overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC with predominantly bone metastases. Apart from the presence of bone only metastases, no validated prognostic clinical factors are widely used to select patients for treatment with Ra-223.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of men with mCRPC treated with Ra-223 at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Clinical and disease characteristics were reviewed. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Uni- (UVA) and multi-variate (MVA) analyses (Cox-regression) were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors.

Results

Between May 2015 and July 2018, 150 men received Ra-223. The median age was 74 years (52-93), and the median number of doses received was 6 (94 [62.7%] received >4 doses, 56 [37.3%] received ≤4 doses). 58% had 6-20 bone metastases and 28% had > 20. The following baseline factors had a median (range) of: ECOG 1 (0-3), ALP 110 U/L (35-1633), Hb 120 g/L (69-160), PSA 49 ug/L (0.83-7238), LDH 230 U/L (82-1426), Albumin (ALB) 39 g/L (24-47), PSADT 2.4 months (-27-218). The median OS for the overall cohort was 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-18). UVA and MVA results are presented in the table. A prognostic index model based on the MVA, which assigned 1 point for each factor (ECOG 2-3, PSA>80 ug/L, ALP >150 U/L, ALB <35 g/L), identified three distinct prognostic groups. Median OS for the good risk (≤1 factor) (n=103), intermediate risk (2 factors) (n=30), and poor risk (≥3 factors) (n=17) was 19.4 (95% CI 17.4-21.8), 10.0 (95% CI 6.1-13.9), and 3.1 months (95% CI 1.2-5.1), respectively (P<0.001). Table: 668P

Baseline Factor UVA MVA
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
ALB <35 g/L 2.5 (1.6-4.0) <0.001 2.0 (1.2-3.2) 0.005
ALP > 150 U/L 2.2 (1.6-3.3) <0.001 1.8 (1.3-2.7) 0.002
ECOG (2-3) 2.4 (1.5-4.0) <0.001 3.0 (2.0-4.7) <0.001
Hb < 120 g/L 2.0 (1.4-2.9) <0.001 1.5 (1.0-2.2) 0.052
LDH > 220 U/L 1.8 (1.3-2.6) 0.001 1.4 (0.9-2.0) 0.102
PSA > 80 ug/L 2.0 (1.5-3.0) <0.001 1.7 (1.2-2.5) 0.006
PSADT< 3months 1.5 (1.0-2.2) 0.026 1.3 (0.9-1.8) 0.22

Conclusions

Baseline ECOG, ALP, PSA and ALB were independently associated with OS and could be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from Ra-223. Validation in an independent dataset should be encouraged.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Aaron Hansen.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

A. Sacher: Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (institution): Genentech-Roche; Honoraria (institution): Merck. A. Zlotta: Advisory/Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory/Consultancy: Ferring; Advisory/Consultancy: Janssen. A. Hansen: Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Merck; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Boston Biomedical; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): GSK; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): BoehringerIngelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Medimmune; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.