Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1609P - Cancer care in Croatia, comparison with surrounding countries: Can we do better?

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Bioethical Principles and GCP

Tumour Site

Presenters

Renata Kelemenic-Drazin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S903-S913. 10.1016/annonc/annonc287

Authors

R. Kelemenic-Drazin1, A. Budisavljevic2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department For Hematology, Oncology And Clinical Immunology, General Hospital Varazdin, 42000 - Varazdin/HR
  • 2 Oncology Department, General Hospital Pula, 52100 - Pula/HR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1609P

Background

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide. In the European Union (EU), Croatia (HR) and Hungary have the highest standardized cancer mortality rates (each min 330/100,000 inhabitants, EU average 259.5/100,000 inhabitants). The five-year survival rates for cancer patients in HR are also lower than the EU average. By analysing all segments of oncology care, we wanted to find out what could be the reason for this.

Methods

This paper contains data from all oncology centres in HR (nine non-clinical and five clinical hospital centres), data from the Croatian Bureau of Statistics, the Croatian Institute of Public Health, Eurostat and the Swedish Institute for Health Economics.

Results

In HR, the health care of patients with malignant diseases is carried out in clinical hospital centres (CHC) and general hospitals (GH). 48% of the population live in counties that do not have clinical oncology centres. 30% of them have access to oncology treatment in their counties and 18% do not have oncology treatment in their counties. More people in HR than in any other EU Member State claim that their health needs are not met due to geographical distance (HR 0.6%, EU 0.1%). The presence of risk factors in HR is higher than the EU average, especially smoking and obesity and the response to screening programs for breast cancer, colorectal cancer and cervical cancer is generally below the EU average. In HR in 2020 there are 130 oncologists (3.1 oncologists/100,000 inhabitants), which is less than the EU average (Italy 7.1; Spain 3.9; United Kingdom 3.8; Germany 3.5). 106 oncologists (82%) work in clinical centres and 24 oncologists (18%) in non-clinical centres. 62 physicians specialize in oncology (77% for CHC and 23% for GH). The radiation equipment in HR is insufficient: there are 15 linear accelerators out of an optimal 24 (0.4/100,000 inhabitants) and has a waiting time of ∼ 2.5 months. In 2017, HR spent 6.8% of GDP on health care, less than the EU average (9.8%). Direct costs per capita for cancer treatment are significantly lower than other EU Member States (HR 100 €, EU average 195 €).

Conclusions

If we want to improve the outcomes of cancer patients in HR, considerable efforts must be made to improve all segments of cancer care.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Renata Kelemenić-Dražin.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.