Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

245P - Breast cancer in young women (BCYW): Clinical impact of diagnosis in asymptomatic patients

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Miriam Mendez Garcia

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S303-S339. 10.1016/annonc/annonc267

Authors

M. Mendez Garcia1, J. Sánchez Gonzalez1, M. Blanco Clemente1, B. Nunez Garcia1, M.C. Vega Carrasco2, C. Alfaro Autor1, B. De la Puente Orteu1, M. Martínez Cutillas1, R. Aguado Noya1, M. López Valcárcel3, M. Provencio Pulla1, B. Cantos Sánchez de Ibarguen1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222 - Majadahonda/ES
  • 2 Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222 - Majadahonda/ES
  • 3 Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222 - Majadahonda/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 245P

Background

There is a general consensus for mammography screening to detect breast cancers (BC) at a pre-clinical stage for women aged 50–69 years and some groups with risk factors as familiar cancer or previous radiotherapy. Evidence in younger women is more limited but BC diagnosis in asymptomatic patients it's still common and its clinical impact is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study selecting patients ≤45 years with BC diagnosis in the Breast Cancer Unit of the Puerta de Hierro Hospital between 2014 and 2019. Epidemiological, pathological and treatment information was collected. We explored the differences between asymptomatic women and those who consulted for symptoms.

Results

From a database of 2270 women within situ or infiltrating BC, we select 372 patients ≤45 years and divided them by clinical at diagnosis, symptomatic vs. asymptomatic (screening). Table: 245P

Symptomatic % Asymptomatic % All Univariate analysis: p
n (%) 266 (71,5) 106 (28,5) 372
Age (IQR) 40,3 (37,2 – 43,8) 41 (38,8 – 44,1) 40,5 (37,8 – 43,9)
In situ / Invasive BC 4,9 / 95,1 24,5 / 75,5 10,7 / 83,3 p < 0.000
FA breast 27,4 45,3 32,1 p = 0,001
FA ovary 4,51 4,72 4,36 p = 0,920
BRCA1/2 carrier 5,26 13,21 7,18 p = 0,013
Stage p = 0,002
I 31,9 54 37,3
II 39,9 31,6 37,6
III 21,2 6,6 18,2
IV 5,3 4 4,8
Axillary staging + 48 29,2 43,8 p = 0,004
Subtypes p = 0,071
Triple Negative 13,8 4,2 11,2
RRHH+ HER2- 66,1 79,1 69.5
RRHH+ HER2+ 14,2 13,9 14,3
RRHH- HER2+ 5,9 2,8 5
Treatment
Neoadjuvant CT 36,8 16,3 31 p = 0,001
CT (neo or adjuvant) 73,3 51,3 68,5 p < 0,000
Mastectomy 66,8 68 67,2 p = 0,850
Lymphadenectomy 58,7 27,8 52 p < 0,000

Conclusions

Clinical and treatment differences have been observed in association with the presence of symptoms. There is no consensus in performing BC screening in women <50, but an early detection adapting it to the risk could achieve an earlier detection at a lower stage, decrease the aggressiveness of cancer treatment and increase the chances of cure.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.