Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

743P - Activity of systemic therapies after cabozantinib (CABO) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Luigi Cerbone

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

L. Cerbone1, V. Di Nunno2, L. Carril1, A. Benchimol-Zouari1, R. Flippot3, C. Alves Costa Silva1, E. Colomba-Blameble4, A. Guida5, L. derosa1, B. Escudier6, L. Albiges7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Departement De Medecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94800 - Villejuif/FR
  • 2 Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Bellaria, Bologna/IT
  • 3 Departement De Medecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 5 Medical And Traslational Oncology, Ospedale Santa Chiara di Terni, Terni/IT
  • 6 Department Of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 7 Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 743P

Background

CABO has been approved as first and further line therapy in pts with mRCC. No evidence is available about the efficacy of other drugs after CABO, and optimal therapeutic sequence is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective mono-institutional study in pts with mRCC who progressed after CABO. Demographics, disease data and therapeutic data were obtained from pts electronic medical records. We evaluated response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Fifty-six pts received subsequent therapy after CABO (Table), with either axitinib (32%), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI, 32%), everolimus (29%), other targeted therapy (7%). Among 40 evaluable pts, disease control rate (DCR) was 43%: 14 (35%) [CE1] had stable disease and 3 (7,5%) partial responses: One pt with axitinib and 2 with ICI had PR (8%). DCR for axitinib, ICI, other TKI and everolimus and were respectively 60%, 46%, 43% and 30 %. Median TTF was 2.8 months (mo) in the entire cohort, 5.7mo for axitinib, 2.3mo for everolimus, 2.5 mo for ICI, and 3.5mo for other targeted agents. Table: 743P

Variable N=56 (%)
Male 36(64%)
Age, median (range) 62 (23-79)
Histology Clear Cell Papillary I / II Chromophobe Unclassified 40 (71) 4 (7)/ 12 (13) 4 (7) 1(2%)
IMDC score Good Intermediate Poor Unknown 11 (24 %) 24 (52%) 11 (24%) 10
Previous ICI use (%) 27 (48%)
Number of prior line ( including Cabo) 1: 1 (1,8%) 2: 23 (41%) 3: 19 (33.9%) ≥4: 13 (23,2%)
Median OS After cabo 9.7 mos
mTTF Overall 2.8 mos Axi 5.7 mos Eve 2.3 mos ICB 2.8 mos

Conclusions

Activity of subsequent treatment after CABO is limited. Patients treated with axitinib had numerically better outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E. Colomba-Blameble: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: GSK; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Novartis. B. Escudier: Honoraria (self): Oncorena; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: EUSA pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche/Genentech; Research grant/Funding (institution): BMS France. L. Albiges: Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Astellas Pharma; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), (inst): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Corvus Pharmaceuticals; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Exelixis; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Merck; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): MSD; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Peloton Therapeutics; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, (inst): Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.