Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1693P - Accurate triage may be efficacious in selecting patients who could safely continue anticancer therapy during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

COVID-19 and Cancer

Tumour Site

Presenters

Cristina Gurizzan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S934-S973. 10.1016/annonc/annonc289

Authors

C. Gurizzan, R. Pedersini, C. Fornaro, C. Sardini, M. Zamparini, S. Monteverdi, V. Tovazzi, D. Cosentini, A. Dalla Volta, A. Baggi, A. Turla, P. Di Mauro, L. Lorini, M. Laganà, S. Bianchi, S. Intagliata, F. Consoli, E. Conti, P. Bossi, A. Berruti

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 - Brescia/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1693P

Background

During the SARS-COV-2 pandemic, cancer patients (pts) who are infected may develop severe disease if their systemic treatment is not temporarily stopped. Nasopharyngeal swab was not extensively available to screen cancer pts for SARS-COV-2 infection in northern Italy, the most area in the country most affected by the pandemic. From the beginning of the outbreak onwards, all pts admitted to the Medical Oncology Unit at Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, underwent a triage investigating the presence of symptoms and signs suggestive of SARS-COV-2 infection. Triage results were used to decide which pts should continue antineoplastic treatments.

Methods

All consecutive cancer pts being admitted for systemic treatment from February 24th to April 21st 2020 were considered. Triage, performed by a trained nurse, consisted of questions regarding the presence of fever, cough, dyspnea, anosmia, dysgeusia, headache, nasal congestion, conjunctival congestion, sore throat, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, measurement of body temperature and pulse oximetry. All enrolled pts were followed-up for overt SARS-COV-2 development until May 18th.

Results

Overall, 1180 pts were included, 54% female and median age 65 years. Most represented primary malignancies were breast (32%), gastroenteric (18%) and lung (16.5%). Thirty-one (2.5%) presented with clinically evident SARS-COV-2 disease and infection was proven by positive nasopharyngeal swab and/or radiological imaging. The triage identified 69 (6%) “grey zone” pts, with suspicious symptoms (i.e. fever 41%, cough 30%, dyspnea 19%). The nasopharyngeal swab was negative in 48% of them and was not performed in the remaining 52% of pts, as well as in all pts who were triage negative. Both SARS-COV-2 positive and “grey zone” pts did not receive treatment and were addressed to hospitalisation or home quarantine. All the 1080 pts (91.5%) who resulted negative at triage continued their antineoplastic therapy as scheduled, none of them presenting symptoms of SARS-COV-2 infection during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Accurate triage allowed safe continuation of anticancer treatment in 91.5% of pts during the SARS-COV-2 outbreak.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.