Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1876P - A combination model of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) and lab measurements in prediction of immune related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment response of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Sanna Iivanainen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S988-S1017. 10.1016/annonc/annonc291

Authors

S.M.E. Iivanainen1, J. Ekstrom2, V. Kataja2, H. Virtanen2, J. Koivunen1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology And Radiation Therapy Department, Oulu University Hospital, 90220 - Oulu/FI
  • 2 Digital Therapeutics, Kaiku Health Oy, 00500 - Helsinki/FI

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1876P

Background

ICIs have introduced irAEs, arising from various organs without temporal connection to the therapy. Furthermore, treatment benefit evaluation with ICIs is often difficult. Data collected from various sources could be used to build machine learning (ML) based tools to improve the early detection of irAEs and treatment benefit which could improve patient care, quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness of ICIs.

Methods

This study combined datasets from four separate sources. The first dataset consisted of 16 540 reported symptoms collected with Kaiku Health digital platform from 33 ICI treated cancer patients. Other dataset included laboratory measurements, prospectively collected irAEs (n=26), including dates and CTCAE based severity, and investigator assessed treatment responses (n=33). Datasets were combined from 4 to 12 weeks of the treatment initiation to analyze the relationships between the variables. The symptoms reported less than two weeks before lab measurements were linked together. When analyzing the days before the onset of irAEs, all data from two weeks before the diagnosis were considered. The final dataset used in the analysis consisted of 227 samples from 33 patients including 16 monitored symptoms and 11 lab values.

Results

Increases in ALT, ALP, Creatinine and especially thyrotropin correlated strongly with clinical benefit (CB). From the monitored symptoms itching, nausea and dizziness had positive correlation with CB. ALP, leukocytes and neutrophils had positive and nausea negative correlation with irAEs. Rash and increases in thyrotropin correlated notably with the upcoming onset of irAEs.

Conclusions

The results of the study show that irAEs and treatment benefit both correlate with ePRO collected symptom data and laboratory values. It is feasible that both sources of data could be used in building ML based prediction models for irAEs and treatment benefit.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03928938.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors/ the study investigators.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

J. Ekstro; V. Kataja: Full/Part-time employment: Kaiku Health Oy. H. Virtanen: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Kaiku Health Oy. J. Koivunen: Advisory/Consultancy: Kaiku Health Oy. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.