Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display & Cocktail

80P - Real-world analysis of side effect profile of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) targeting agents and their correlation to clinical outcomes

Date

03 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display & Cocktail

Presenters

Akshee Batra

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2025) 10 (suppl_2): 1-8. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop104219

Authors

A. Batra1, R. Singh2, A. Chitkara3, C.T. Jani1, J. Sharma1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hematology And Oncology, University of Miami, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 33130 - Miami/US
  • 2 Hematology-oncology Dept., University of Vermont - Larner College of Medicine, 05405 - Burlington/US
  • 3 Hematology And Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 92521 - Riverside/US

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 80P

Background

FGFR-targeting agents offer promising cancer therapies but are associated with side effects that can impact treatment outcomes and quality of life.

Methods

We analyzed four FDA-approved FGFR inhibitors (Erdafitinib, Pemigatinib, Infigratinib, and Futibatinib) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Adverse events were categorized by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology. We assessed the relative reported risks of adverse outcomes in commonly reported events to compare safety profiles and identify common and serious side effects.

Results

1,611 adverse event reports linked to FGFR inhibitors were identified, with Erdafitinib accounting for 59.1% of reports. Common side effects included generalized deconditioning (19.5%), ocular issues (12.3%), gastrointestinal problems (7.7%), skin reactions (6.6%), renal issues (6.3%), mouth ulcers/dryness (7.8%), nail changes (7.3%), and liver toxicity (3.6%). Serious outcomes were reported in 67.3% of cases, with 25.1% resulting in death and 22.5% leading to hospitalization. Statistically significant findings from the table include a higher relative risk of mortality with gastrointestinal issues, renal issues, and mouth ulcers. Table: 80P

Side Effect Death Hospitalization
RR 95% CI P-value RR 95% CI P-value
Hyperphosphatemia 1.42 0.85 - 2.39 0.164 1.17 0.71 - 1.92 0.531
Fatigue 1.73 1.09 - 2.74 0.012 1.22 0.81 - 1.83 0.325
GI issues 4.59 2.57 - 8.19 <0.001 1.21 1.08 - 1.34 <0.001
Renal issues 3.84 1.87 - 7.90 <0.01 0.78 0.56 - 1.07 0.141
Mouth ulcers/dryness 4.29 1.83 - 10.07 <0.01 1.34 0.82 - 2.17 0.225
Liver toxicity 1.22 0.73 - 2.04 0.426 0.53 0.38 - 0.73 <0.001

Conclusions

Careful monitoring of patients undergoing treatment with FGFR inhibitors is essential, especially for those experiencing adverse events, as these can significantly impact overall survival. While guidelines recommend continuing FGFR inhibitors in cases of mild or moderate renal dysfunction, the link between renal dysfunction and increased mortality observed in this study underscores the need for heightened clinician vigilance. Tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs is crucial for optimizing outcomes and minimizing the risks associated with severe complications.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.