Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display & Cocktail

111P - First successful local implementation and two years of experience with comprehensive molecular profiling in Ukraine during the war

Date

03 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display & Cocktail

Presenters

Dmytro Shapochka

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2025) 10 (suppl_2): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop104255

Authors

D. Shapochka1, V. Samusieva2, A. Moskalenko3, N. Shtefan4, D. Dekar5, A. Fesenko3, D. Nehrulia6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Molecular Pathology, Clinical Hospital Feofaniya, 03143 - Kiev/UA
  • 2 Pathology Department, Medical Laboratory DILA, 01103 - Kiev/UA
  • 3 Kyiv, Medical Laboratory DILA, 01103 - Kiev/UA
  • 4 Molecular Genetics, Genecode laboratory, Kyiv/UA
  • 5 Institute Of Biology And Medicine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01601 - Kiev/UA
  • 6 Department Of Enzymology Of Protein Synthesis, Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03143 - Kiev/UA

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 111P

Background

The integration of molecular profiling (MP) into clinical practice faces some challenges, particularly in Ukraine where war-related restrictions and logistical issues complicate the access to international laboratories. Inadequate sample quality and a lack of expertise also make the local implementation of MP difficult. This study explores the feasibility and efficiency of molecular profiling for cancer patients in Ukraine where these barriers limit treatment options.

Methods

MP was conducted using OncoMine Comprehensive Plus assay (Thermo) to analyze genetic alterations in 51 patients (29 women, 22 men, mean age 51). The average TAT for results was eight working days: 63% results within 2 weeks and 86% within 3 weeks. According to 2024 ESMO NGS guidelines, patients with eight types of cancers were tested, namely CRC, NSCLC, ovarian cancer, breast carcinoma, sarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and CUP.

Results

Valid results were obtained in 90% of cases for single-gene markers and in 50% for genomic markers. 36 (71%) patients had actionable genetic alterations for targeted therapies or immunotherapy. 15 (29%) patients had no clear therapeutic options. According to OncoKB system, 18 (35%) alterations were classified as OncoKB 1-2 (BRAF V600E (4), BRCA1/2 (3), EGFR (1), IDH1 (3), LOH-High (5), NTRK (1), PIK3CA (1), TMB-High (5)) and 18 (35%) had treatment options with lower OncoKB level of evidence. Additionally, 7 (14%) patients had potentially germline mutations requiring genetic counseling.

Conclusions

Therapeutically significant markers were found in 71% of patients, 50% among those level 1 or 2 according to OncoKB. The study stresses the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach to applying molecular data in clinical practice, which can improve treatment outcomes and patient prognoses in Ukraine.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Study group.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.