Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail and Poster Display session

32P - Validation of the Scottish Immunotherapy Prognostic Score (SIPS) in NSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab

Date

26 Feb 2024

Session

Cocktail and Poster Display session

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Martin Igor Gomez-Randulfe Rodriguez

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_1): 1-7. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102270

Authors

M.I. Gomez-Randulfe Rodriguez1, I. Phillips2, F. Gomes1, M. Mackean2, M. Stares2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept - Thoracic Malignancies, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, M20 4BX - Manchester/GB
  • 2 Oncology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, EH4 2XR - Edinburgh/GB

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 32P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab have changed the treatment paradigm of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), especially for tumors with high PD-L1 expression. However, responses to pembrolizumab vary, highlighting the need for effective and easy-to-implement biomarkers. Although numerous scores assessing systemic inflammation have been published, most of them lack external validation, impeding their clinical implementation. This study aims to validate the prognostic utility of the Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS) in an independent cohort.

Methods

We included 257 aNSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% who were treated with first-line pembrolizumab at The Christie between June 2017 and May 2023. Data on demographics, histology, PD-L1 status, and laboratory metrics were collected. The SIPS was determined by allocating 1 point each for a baseline albumin <35 g/l and a neutrophil count >7.5 × 10ˆ9/l, resulting in a three-tier classification: 0 for good prognosis, 1 for intermediate prognosis, and 2 for poor prognosis.

Results

The cohort had a median age of 70, with 48% being female. Baseline characteristics stratified by SIPS are highlighted in the table. SIPS effectively stratified PFS: 14.0 months (m) for SIPS 0, 7.9 m for SIPS 1, and a mere 2.5 m for SIPS 2 (p < 0.001). Similarly, SIPS stratified OS: 23.4 m for SIPS 0, 16.4 m for SIPS 1, and 3.7 m for SIPS 2 (p = 0.010). SIPS was predictive of both PFS and OS regardless of PD-L1 expression. The combination of PD-L1 expression ≥90% and SIPS 0 identified a subgroup comprising 23% (n=60) of all patients, with the most favorable PFS (18.9 m) and OS (28.2 m). Table: 32P

Baseline characteristics stratified by SIPS

Characteristic Total SIPS 0 (n=144) SIPS 1 (n=93) SIPS 2 (n=20) p-value
Age 0.021
   <65 85 (33%) 41 (9%) 39 (42%) 5 (25%)
   65-74 104 (40%) 55 (38%) 37 (40%) 12 (60%)
   ≥75 68 (26%) 48 (33%) 17 (18%) 3 (15%)
ECOG PS 0.065
0 36 (14%) 26 (18%) 10 (11%) 0 (0%)
   1 191 (74%) 103 (72%) 73 (79%) 15 (75%)
   2 30 (12%) 15 (10%) 10 (11%) 5 (25%)
Histology 0.147
   Squamous 76 (30%) 44 (31%) 20 (22%) 12 (60%)
   Non-squamous 181 (70%) 100 (69%) 73 (79%) 8 (40%)
PD-L1 0.951
   <90% 148 (58%) 84 (58%) 53 (57%) 11 (55%)
   ≥90% 109 (42%) 60 (42%) 40 (43%) 9 (45%)
Brain metastases 0.036
   Absent 225 (88%) 131 (91%) 75 (81%) 19 (95%)
   Present 32 (12%) 13 (9%) 18 (19%) 1 (5%)

Conclusions

SIPS is a valuable prognostic tool for aNSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab in the context of high PD-L1 expression. It offers a simple and clinically implementable method to stratify patients, potentially guiding treatment decisions in aNSCLC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.