Abstract 85O
Background
Traditionally, dose finding relies on dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose. However, novel therapies may have a wide therapeutic index without dose-dependent toxicities. ctDNA enables early dynamic tumor assessments for potential optimal biological dosing. Quantifying ctDNA burden with lpWGS has advantages with faster turnaround, lower plasma volumes required and lower cost.
Methods
Patients (pts) on early phase trials at the National Cancer Centre Singapore had serial blood collection at pre-defined timepoints (baseline, mid-cycle 1, end cycle 1, first imaging scan). Plasma underwent lpWGS and targeted sequencing, with germline DNA from PBMC, and tissue whole exome sequencing in a subset. ctDNA burden was quantified with established (ichorCNA; DNA copy number) and novel (Fragle; cell-free DNA fragmentation patterns) bioinformatic methods. Early ctDNA kinetics (reduction as response; increase as progression) was correlated with imaging (RECIST v1.1).
Results
From 2021-23, 68 advanced cancer pts were screened. 34 pts had serial (including baseline) samples (total 102 samples, median 3, range 2-5). Pts were on targeted therapy (50%), immunotherapy (44%) or combination (6%) trials. ctDNA burden quantified by Fragle vs ichorCNA showed enhanced limit of detection, at baseline (100 vs 53%, n=34) and on-treatment (100 vs 41%, n=68). In all (100%) pts with PR, early ctDNA kinetics (via Fragle but not ichorCNA) showed ctDNA response (Table 85O) prior to imaging. Of 8 pts with SD/PD but early ctDNA response, n=4 had serial timepoints to further evaluate ctDNA kinetics. In all 4 (100%) pts, ctDNA burden subsequently increased consistent with imaging. Table: 85O
Correlation of radiologic and early ctDNA response
n (%) | PR (N=7) | SD (N=12) | PD (N=10) | NE (N=5) |
ctDNA response | 7 (100) | 2 (17) | 6 (60) | 3 (60) |
ctDNA progression | 0 (0) | 10 (83) | 4 (40) | 2 (40) |
Conclusions
Early ctDNA kinetics may represent a pharmacodynamic biomarker for therapeutic response and biologic proof of concept, with implications for dose decision making on early phase trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Funding
National Cancer Centre Singapore.
Disclosure
A.C. Tan: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen, Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca. T.J.Y. Tan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, MSD, Everest Medicines (Singapore) Pte Ltd., DKSH; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: DKSH, AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Sanofi; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ASCO; Other, Personal, Other, Conference sponsorship: DKSH, AstraZeneca, Novartis. P.L.S. Saw: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Guardant Health, AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator: AstraZeneca, Novartis, BeiGene, Dracen. D.W. Lim: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: MSD, Roche, Beigene; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Grant funding for investigator-sponsored study: Bristol Myers Squibb. M.C.H. Ng: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board, Invited Speaker and Chairing Industry symposium,: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board, Invited speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Taiho, DKSH; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca, Amgen, CARsgen Therapeutics; Other, Personal, Other, Travel support: Eisai. D.S.W. Tan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, C4 Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, GSK, Takeda, Eisai, Guardant, Merck, Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Amgen, Pfizer, ACM Biolabs; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
86O - Serial monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a tumor-agnostic biomarker to inform clinical outcomes of patients receiving experimental cancer medicine
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
15O - Targeting CCNE1-amplified ovarian and endometrial cancers by combined inhibition of PKYMT1 and ATR
Presenter: Fiona Simpkins
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1O - Uncovering new immunotherapy targets with machine learning and ex vivo validation
Presenter: Marcellus Augustine
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
74O - Highly potent and selective RET inhibitors that overcome adaptive drug resistance
Presenter: Li Xing
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
28O - Comparison of prognostic scores in oncology patients participating in phase I clinical trials with immunotherapy
Presenter: PALOMA Sangro
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
29O - Clinical characterization of long-term survivors in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Oriol Mirallas
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
6O - Subcutaneous fat mass predicts progression-free survival in patients treated with antibody drug conjugates in early phase clinical trials
Presenter: Matthieu Delaye
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Abstract
Invited discussant abstracts 28O, 29O and 6O
Presenter: Louise Carter
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A
Presenter: All Speakers
Session: Abstract session 2
Resources:
Webcast