Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail and Poster Display session

88P - Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as precision medicine marker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery in primary resectable localized pancreatic cancer

Date

26 Feb 2024

Session

Cocktail and Poster Display session

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology

Tumour Site

Presenters

Patrick Kirchweger

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_1): 1-9. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102310

Authors

P. Kirchweger1, B. Doleschal2, A. Kupferthaler3, J. Burghofer4, G. Webersinke4, S. Schwendinger5, A. Ennemoser5, E. Jukic5, H. Wundsam6, M. Biebl6, H. Rumpold1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH - Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 - Linz/AT
  • 2 Haematology And Oncology Department, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH - Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 - Linz/AT
  • 3 Department Of Diagnostic And Interventional Radiology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, 4010 - Linz/AT
  • 4 Laboratory For Molecular Genetic Diagnostics, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH - Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010 - Linz/AT
  • 5 Institute Of Human Genetics, Innsbruck Medical University, A-6020 - Innsbruck/AT
  • 6 Department Of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, 4010 - Linz/AT

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 88P

Background

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker displaying systemic tumor burden in presumed localized pancreatic cancer (lPC). However, clinical applicability for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) guidance was flawed by low preoperative detection rates (10.2%) without NGS until now. Recently, CA 19-9 >500 U/ml has been implemented into the Austrian guidelines for administration of NACT.

Methods

Liquid Biopsy samples of n=147 patients with lPC were collected 1 day before, 1 day after and 10 days after curative intended surgery and have been analyzed by ddPCR for KRAS G12/13 and, if negative, KRAS Q61. Results have been correlated with tumor volume and outcome.

Results

Detection rates have improved by x3.6 to 36.8% (preop.), 19.7% (1d postop.) and 13.3% (10d postop.). ctDNA showed no correlation with primary tumor volume (p=0.605), but with nodal positivity (p=0.029). Pretherapeutic ctDNA detectability was associated with worse OS (10. (95%CI 4-16.2) vs. 36 (95%CI 22.1-49.9) months, p<0.001) and DFS (6 (95%CI 2.6-9.4) vs. 23.5 (95%CI 17.9-29.1) months, p<0.001), whereas CA 19-9 >500 U/ml was not (p=0.285, p=0.162). Also, postoperative ctDNA detectability showed correlation to DFS (12.9 vs. 29.1 months, p=0.027) and OS (HR 3.120).

Conclusions

This study represents the currently largest prospective cohort on this topic (formerly n=113 by Guo et al., China, 2020). ctDNA allows detection of actual systemic tumor burden and offers a cost effective and clinical applicable method to eventually guide NACT vs. upfront surgery as precision medicine approach in the future adding a biological criteria for high risk of relapse to the up to now radiological resectability.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Krebshilfe Oberösterreich, Vinzenzgruppe.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.