Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail & Poster Display session

51P - Toxicity profile in early clinical trials with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors (FGFRi): 10-years experience of a drug development unit

Date

06 Mar 2023

Session

Cocktail & Poster Display session

Presenters

Katerin Rojas Laimito

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_2): 100896-100896. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop100896

Authors

K.I. Rojas Laimito1, M. Vieito Villar1, B. Fullana Grimalt2, R. Berché1, C. Hierro Carbo3, O. Saavedra Santa Gadea1, I. Braña1, G. Alonso Casal1, V. Galvao de Aguiar1, M.J. Lostes Bardaji1, M. Oliveira1, H. Verdaguer1, R. Morales Barrera1, C. Garcia Duran1, E. Zamora1, J. Carles Galceran1, T. Macarulla1, J. Tabernero1, E. Garralda Cabanas1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)-Cellex Center, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, 08221 - Terrassa/ES
  • 3 Medical Oncology Departmen-early Drug Development, Gi Tumours And Melanoma Group, ICO - Institut Català d'Oncologia Badalona (Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol), 08916 - Badalona/ES

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 51P

Background

FGFRi have been in clinical development for over 10 years, with recent approvals in patients (pts) with cholangiocarcinoma and urothelial tumors with FGFR alterations. Management of toxicity is still challenging with 10-20% of pts experiencing at least one dose reduction, especially hyperphosphatemia. The purpose of our work was to evaluate biomarker inclusion and toxicity profile of pts treated with FGFRi.

Methods

FGFRi-naïve pts included in early clinical trials with FGFRi in VHIO´s Early Drug Development Unit were included in the analysis. Adverse events were evaluated using CTCAE 4.03.

Results

A total of 72 eligible pts were treated between 2012-2022 with 6 different FGFRi. Median age was 56y, 73% female, main tumor types were breast cancer(37%) and colorectal cancer(14%). Most pts(85%) were included based on a biomarker (47% FGFR amplification, 4% FGFR mutation, 3% FGFR fusion and 22% FGFR overexpression/ligand overexpression). Most common alterations occurred in FGFR1(40%), FGFR2(19%), FGFR3(7%), FGFR4(1.7%) and 2.7% with two or more isoforms. Pts treated with panFGFRi (1-4) (76%) had statistically higher % of G2-3 toxicity than pts treated with FGFR1-2-3i(56%)(p<0.01). The commonest ≥G2 toxicity in both groups was hyperphosphatemia (7% G3 and 43% G2), fatigue (17%;G2-3), skin and nail changes (10%;G2-3), ocular/corneal toxicity(8%;G2-3) and diarrhea(6%;G2-3). 40% of pts experiencing G2-3 hyperphosphatemia needed at least 1 dose reduction, and 51.5% had to interrupt treatment. The % of G3 toxicity was statistically superior in pts treated at doses >RP2D than at doses ≤RP2D (p<0.01). Among 16 pts that received doses >RP2D, 68% exhibited G3 toxicity, 75% underwent a dose interruption, and 50% needed dose reduction. Among 56 pts treated at ≤RP2D doses 20% exhibited G3 toxicity, 25% had at least 1 dose interruption and 23% needed dose reduction.

Conclusions

Toxicity management with FGFRi remains challenging with a high proportion of pts requiring dose reductions or interruptions even at the RP2D. FGFRi that spare FGFR4 were associated with lower G3 toxicity. The impact of hyperphosphatemia highlights the potential role of more specific inhibitors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

This research has been funded by the Comprehensive Program of Cancer Immunotherapy & Immunology II (CAIMI-II) supported by the BBVA Foundation (grant 53/2021). The research leading to these results has received funding from ”la Caixa” Foundation (LCF/PR/ CE07/50610001). Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Comprehensive Program of Cancer Immunotherapy & Immunology II (CAIMI-II) supported by the BBVA Foundation (grant 53/2021). The research leading to these results has received funding from “la Caixa” Foundation (LCF/PR/ CE07/50610001). Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.