Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

73P - Tumor localisation and oncological outcomes in non-uterine leiomyosarcoma of the abdomen and pelvis

Date

15 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

MIlan Spasojevic

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_2): 1-32. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102441

Authors

M. Spasojevic1, A.B. Mariathasan1, S. Stoldt1, K. Boye2, T. Holmebakk1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncologic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO
  • 2 Department Of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital - The Norwegian Radium Hospital, 0379 - Oslo/NO

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 73P

Background

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is the second largest group of soft tissue sarcomas and often has an aggressive tumor biology. While evidence supports different biological behavior between uterine (ULMS) and non-uterine leiomyosarcomas (NULMS), the data on clinical outcome for NULMS depending on tumor localization (ie. visceral, retroperitoneal and pelvic) is scarce. This study aimed to analyze the association between tumor localization and oncological outcomes in NULMS.

Methods

Pts with LMS located in the abdomen and pelvis diagnosed between 2005 and 2022 were identified in the institutional sarcoma database at the Norwegian Radium Hospital. Non-operated, ULMS or pts with missing data were excluded. Included pts were divided into 3 subgroups based on primary tumor localisation: visceral, retroperitoneal and pelvic.

Results

A total of 123 pts (73 women) with a median age 62 years were included in the study. There were 48 pts in the retroperitoneal, 35 pts in the visceral and 40 pts in the pelvic subgroup. Median tumor size was 8 (1-32) cm. Retroperitoneal tumors were significantly larger than visceral, median 10.0 cm vs. 5.5 cm; P=0.048. 52 pts had French malignancy grade III. No significant differences in malignancy grade between the subgroups were observed. A free microscopic margin (R0) was achieved in 79 (66%) pts. The R0 rate was lower in the retroperitoneal and pelvic subgroups than for visceral tumors, 46% and 71% vs. 82% respectively; P=0.048. The median follow-up time was 23 (1-135) months. Fifty (47%) pts had disease recurrence; 16 (32%) local recurrences and 34 (68%) pts distant metastases. The median time to recurrence was 8 (3-54) months. The entire cohort's 5- and 10-year OS was 70% and 34%. For pts with retroperitoneal tumors, 5- and 10-year OS was 52% and 24% vs. 61% and 41% in the pelvic and 70% vs. 63% in the visceral subgroup; P=0.018. 5- and 10-year DFS was 30% and 10% for patients with retroperitoneal tumors, 49% and 32% for patients with pelvic tumors and 46% and 36% in the visceral subgroup; P=0.167. The median time from relapse to death was 21 (1-88) months.

Conclusions

Pts with visceral LMS had better oncological outcomes compared to pts with retroperitoneal tumors. Recurrence rates were high and long-term outcome after disease relapse was dismal.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Oslo University Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.