Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

81P - Systemic therapy for advanced synovial sarcoma: Real-world evidence from a reference center

Date

15 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Pawel Sobczuk

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_2): 1-32. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102441

Authors

P. Sobczuk, I.M. Agnieszczak, S. Lipiec, P. Malinowski, K. Kozak, P. Teterycz, P. Rogala, T. Switaj, H.M. Kosela Paterczyk, S. Falkowski, P. Rutkowski

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Soft Tissue/bone Sarcoma And Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 - Warsaw/PL

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 81P

Background

Limited progress has been made in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in the last 20 years, and chemotherapy (chth) remains the backbone of therapy in metastatic settings. Considering the rarity of each STS subtype and the heterogeneity of responses to available treatment regimens, real-world data constitutes a valuable source of evidence. In this study, we aimed to describe the pattern of care and outcomes for patients with advanced synovial sarcoma.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma treated with systemic therapies (+/- local therapy). Patient and tumor characteristics were collected from electronic records at MSCNRIO in Warsaw, Poland.

Results

Between 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021 134 patients (49.3% females) were included. The median age was 41.6 years (16-90). The majority, 88.1%, underwent curative surgery for the primary disease, and 84.7% of them received perioperative chth. Distant metastases were present at diagnosis in 44 patients (32.8%). The median time from diagnosis to systemic therapy was 18.3 months. Median number of lines was 3 (1-8). Median PFS and OS in 1st line were 7.8 (95%CI 7.0-8.6) and 22.3 (95%CI 19.9-24.7) months, respectively. The most common chth in 1st line was high-dose ifosfamide in 65.7%, followed by doxorubicin-based regimens in 29.9%, but no differences in PFS were observed between both regimens (8.7 vs 7.0 months, p=0.735) in the overall population. 52.2% of patients underwent surgery in 1st line, which resulted in improved PFS (19.9 vs. 4.2 months, p<0.001). Among patients without local therapy, ifosfamide-based chth was more effective than doxorubicin (6.0 vs. 2.9 months, p=0.012). Median PFS in 2nd and 3rd lines were 3.5 and 3.0 months, respectively. In further lines, pazopanib was the most active drug, with a median PFS of 5.1 months. Disease control as best response was achieved in 65.7% of patients in 1st line and 34.6% in 2nd line.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed observations from previous studies about the role of local therapy and the activity of ifosfamide-based chth in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma. The activity of systemic therapy in 2nd and next lines is very limited, with some activity of pazopanib and rechallenge with ifosfamide.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

P. Sobczuk: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Grant: MSD, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Swixx BioPharma, BMS, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sandoz; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: CelonPharma; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Product Samples: Immutep; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Board Member, Chair of Young Oncologists Section: Polish Society of Clinical Oncology. K. Kozak: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squib, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi. P. Teterycz: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Roche. P. Rogala: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pierre Fabre. T. Switaj: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: MSD. H.M. Kosela Paterczyk: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: PharmaMar. P. Rutkowski: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, honoraria for lectures: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Sanofi, Blueprint Medicines, Philogen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, research grant for ISS: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, research grant for institution: BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of Board of Directors: Polish Society of Surgical Oncology; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of Board of Directors, President: Polish Oncological Society. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.