Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

135P - Influence of next generation sequencing on sarcomas management in the real-world setting in Oman: Retrospective single institution analysis

Date

15 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Boris Itkin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_2): 1-32. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102441

Authors

B. Itkin1, H. Al-Sayegh2, P. Deshpande3, D.A. Abdou4, A. Pullanhi2, Z.G. Sawaya5, S. Al Zadjali2, I. Al Haddabi3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, SQCCCRC - Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, H5JG+9VW - Seeb/OM
  • 2 Research Laboratory, SQCCCRC - Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, 123 - Muscat/OM
  • 3 Pathology, SQCCCRC - Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre, 123 - Muscat/OM
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, H5JG+9VW - Seeb/OM
  • 5 Nursing, Universite Saint Joseph de Beirut, 1104 2020 - Beirut/LB

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 135P

Background

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to refine sarcoma diagnosis and identify actionable biomarkers. However, its impact on the management of real-world sarcoma patients is less studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the frequency of actionable variants and NGS-induced diagnostic and therapeutic modifications in unselected sarcoma patients at a Cancer Center in Oman.

Methods

Subjects of any age with sarcomas of any grade who underwent NGS at SQCCCRC between January 2022 and October 2023 were eligible. Relevant clinical and molecular information was retrieved from medical records and quantitatively described. Actionable variants were graded according to OncoKB Levels. Changes in diagnosis and treatment plans after NGS were recorded.

Results

We included 63 patients with a median age of 35 years, of whom 50.8% were female. The most prevalent sarcoma subtypes were Ewing sarcoma (15.9%), Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) (14.3%), and leiomyosarcoma (11.1%). Whole exome sequencing and targeted sequencing were used in 61% and 39% of cases, respectively. Actionable variants of OncoKB Level 1 were identified in 19.1%, Levels 2/3 in 0%, and Level 4 in 12.7%. We observed NGS-induced changes in diagnosis in 9.5% of patients and treatment modifications in 12.7%; 4.8% resulting from diagnosis changes and 7.9% based on actionable biomarkers. Excluding GIST, OncoKB Level 1 biomarkers were found in 4/54 (7.4%) patients, and Level 4 in 7/54 (13%) patients. Biomarker-based treatment changes occurred in 2/54 (3.7%) patients.

Conclusions

NGS was useful in refining diagnoses. Actionable biomarkers were identified in a significant proportion of sarcomas. However, in non-GIST sarcomas, we observed less biomarker-induced treatment changes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.