Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

100P - Impact of multiple therapeutic procedures on patients with cardiac hemangiosarcoma: A SEER-based study

Date

15 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Zaid Shakhatreh

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_2): 1-32. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102441

Authors

Z. Shakhatreh1, R.M. Odat1, D. Nguyen2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Faculty Of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, 21941 - IRBID/JO
  • 2 Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Harvard Medical School, 02114 - Boston/US

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 100P

Background

Cardiac hemangiosarcomas originate from blood vessel-forming cells and are described as aggressive malignant tumors. However, with limited data on the safety and efficacy of different therapeutic modalities an optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. We conducted a comprehensive analysis on the effect of various therapeutic procedures on the survival outcomes of cardiac hemangiosarcoma patients.

Methods

In a retrospective cohort analysis, we examined data from 196 patients diagnosed with cardiac hemangiosarcoma between 2000 to 2020, sourced from the SEER database. Cox proportional hazards model assessed the relationships between these factors and survival outcomes.

Results

The study included 196 patients (47.7 females) with cardiac hemangiosarcoma. Among the subjects, 55.6% were less than 50 years old, while 44.4% were aged 50 or older. The grade distribution was as follows: 2.6% for Grade 2, 18.9% for Grade 3, 19.9% for Grade 4, while 58.7% were of unknown grade. Most patients were in distant stage, 41.3%. Treatment modalities among the participants were diverse: 53.6% underwent surgery, 20.4% received radiation therapy, and 61.7% were treated with chemotherapy. By the study's conclusion, 89.3% of the patients had deceased, while 10.7% were still living. Tumor size distribution revealed 4.6% with a size less than 3cm, 38.8% with a size equal to or greater than 3cm, and 56.6% with unknown tumor size. Univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox Proportional Hazard Model demonstrated significant associations with survival outcomes for surgery (HR=0.614, 95% CI [0.454-0.831], P=0.002; HR=0.562, 95% CI [0.414-0.764], P=<0.001), chemotherapy (HR=0.529, 95% CI [0.386-0.725], P=<0.001; HR=0.49, 95% CI [0.356-0.676], =P=<0.001), and in significant in radiation (HR=0.786, 95% CI [0.545-1.132], P=0.196; HR=0.754, 95% CI [0.523-1.089], P=0.132).

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that surgery and chemotherapy were significantly associated with improved overall survival, while radiation therapy had no significant effect on patients with cardiac hemangiosarcoma. The results require further validation by future prospective studies and exploration in the optimal sequence each therapeutic modality.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.