Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

154P - Impact of denosumab as neoadjuvant treatment for giant cell bone tumors: Insights from Peru

Date

15 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Cindy Calle

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_2): 1-5. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102403

Authors

L.D.C. Chavez Jimenez1, I. Otoya F.1, C. Calle1, J.C. Haro Varas1, A.D. Leonardo Carbajal1, V.R. Paitan Amaro1, V. Velezmoro2, M. Flores2, R. Pareja2, M.J. Calderon Anticona1, C. Pacheco1, V. Castro Oliden1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, INEN - Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, 15038 - Lima/PE
  • 2 Radiodiagnosis Department, INEN - Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, 15038 - Lima/PE

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 154P

Background

Giant cell bone tumors (GCT) are primary locally aggressive neoplasms that occasionally manifest with distant metastasis. Denosumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against the RANK ligand, is indicated for its effectiveness in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic GCT.

Methods

An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and retrospective study was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas de Lima, Peru evaluating patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2022 who received neoadjuvant denosumab treatment.

Results

In this study of 34 patients with an average age of 30.5 years, predominantly females (55.9%), the average time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 7 months. Common symptoms included pain (91.2%), swelling (64.7%), and fractures (14.7%). The most frequent tumor locations were the femur, fibula, sacrum, and tibia, each accounting for 11.8%. No metastases were observed at onset. Soft tissue involvement occurred in 50% of patients, joint involvement in 17.2%, fractures in 13.1%, and adjacent bone involvement in 17.2%. Radiologically, 8.8% had type II disease, 88.3% had type III by the Campanacci classification, and 2.9% were undetermined. By Enneking classification, 2.9% had type I, 88.2% had type III, and 8.9% were undetermined. Regarding neoadjuvant Denosumab treatment, 35.35% experienced adverse effects, mostly grade 1, including bone pain, hypocalcemia, and anemia. Surgical intervention was undergone by 58.8%, with 81% opting for conservative surgeries. Only 20.6% received radiotherapy. Follow-up studies showed 96.6% with no progression, 97.1% remained alive, and 2.9% resulted in death.

Conclusions

This is the first study in Peru that provides a detailed perspective on neoadjuvant Denosumab treatment in patients with GCT. Treatment with denosumab has allowed conservative surgeries to be performed in the majority of previously inoperable patients. These findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of the neoadjuvant approach with Denosumab, with a low incidence of significant adverse effects.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas de Lima, Peru.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.