Abstract 1O
Background
Maximum safe surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation and temozolomide chemotherapy is the current standard of care in the management of newly diagnosed high grade glioma. However, there are controversies about the optimal number of adjuvant temozolomide cycles. This study aimed to compare the survival benefits of 12 cycles against 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide adults with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas.
Methods
Adult patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas, and a Karnofsky performance status >60%, were randomized to receive either 6 cycles or 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were followed-up for assessment of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by brain MRI every 3 months within the first year after treatment and then every six months.
Results
A total of 100 patients (6 cycles, n=50; 12 cycles, n=50) were entered. The rate of treatment completion in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 91.3% and 55.1%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 26 months, the 12-, 24-, 36, and 48-month OS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 81.3% vs 78.8%, 58.3% vs 49.8%, 47.6% vs 34.1%, and 47.6% vs 31.5%, respectively (p-value=.19). Median OS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 35 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0 to 58.9) and 23 months (95%CI, 16.9 to 29.0). The 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48- month DFS rates in 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups were 70.8% vs 56.9%, 39.5% and 32.7%, 27.1% vs 28.8%, and 21.1% vs 28.8%, respectively (p=.88). The Median PFS of 6 cycles and 12 cycles groups was 18 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 21.1) and 16 (95% CI, 11.0 to 20.9) months.
Table: 1O
The characteristics of the patients at baseline
Characteristics | Entire group: 95 patients | ||
TMZ 6-cycle, 46 patients n (%) | TMZ 12-cycle, 49 patients n (%) | P value | |
Male gender | 37 (80.4) | 28 (57.1) | 0.015 |
Age > 45 | 22 (47.8) | 25 (51) | 0.75 |
Karnofsky performance status ≥ 80% | 32 (69.5) | 31 (63.2) | 0.43 |
Focal neurological deficits | 16 (34.8) | 18 (36.7) | 0.83 |
Tumor resection: | |||
Gross total | 8 (17.4) | 9 (18.4) | |
Subtotal | 28 (60.9) | 24 (49) | 0.43 |
Biopsy only | 10 (21.7) | 16 (32.7) | |
Histology: | 0.82 | ||
Glioblastoma | 37 (80.4) | 40 (81.6) | |
Anaplastic astrocytoma | 9 (19.6) | 9 (18.4) |
Conclusions
Patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas treated with adjuvant temozolomide after maximum safe surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation do not benefit from extended adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles.
Clinical trial identification
IRCT20160706028815N3.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
Pineal region tumours
Presenter: Giuseppe Lombardi
Session: CNS
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Primary CNS lymphoma
Presenter: Khe Hoang-Xuan
Session: CNS
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Rare pituitary tumours
Presenter: Laetitia Lebrun
Session: CNS
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant abstract 1O
Presenter: Ahmed Idbaih
Session: CNS
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Q&A and discussion
Session: CNS
Resources:
Webcast