Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

108P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus TACE alone in patients with Barcelona Clinic liver cancer stage B unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis

Date

12 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Hongjie Cai

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 24 (suppl_1): 1-20. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100744

Authors

H. Cai

Author affiliations

  • Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 108P

Background

The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B (BCLC-B stage) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is partially unsatisfactory. Systemic therapy and TACE are widely used in BCLC-B stage HCC patients. This study aims to explore the efficacy of combining systemic therapy with transarterial-based therapy in unresectable BCLC-B stage HCC patients.

Methods

A total of 76 newly diagnosed HCC patients with BCLC-B stage were included in this retrospective cohort study. These patients were divided into two groups: TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab group (TACE-AT group, n=37) and TACE monotherapy group (TACE group, n= 39). Propensity score matching was used to account for potential confounding factors. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), liver function, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded and evaluated.

Results

After propensity score matching, 31 patients were assigned to each group.The TACE-AT group showed higher overall response rate [93.5%(29/31) vs. 48.4%(15/31), P<0.001] than the TACE group.Furthermore, the TACE-AT group showed longer median PFS (8.4 vs. 4.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.239, P <0.001) than the TACE group. The TACE-AT group showed better OS than the TACE group (median OS not reached vs. 19.4 months, P <0.001). There was no significant difference in disease control rate between the two groups.The grade 3/4 adverse events rates were similar between the two groups (19.3% vs. 25.4%, P=0.082).

Conclusions

The combination of TACE, atezolizumab and bevacizumab provides clinical benefits for patients with intermediate HCC, has an acceptable safety profile, shows a trend towards improving liver function, and does not increase the occurrence of grade 3-4 AEs.

Legal entity responsible for the study

H. Cai.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.