Abstract 211P
Background
Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) experience a rapidly deteriorating clinical trajectory characterized by therapeutic resistance and dismal survival, particularly following the development of malignant ascites. However, the intricate dynamics within the peritoneal microenvironment (PME) during treatment process remains largely unknown.
Methods
Matched samples from primary tumors (PT), malignant ascites, and peritoneal metastases (PM), along with paired pre-treatment and post-chemo/immunotherapy progression ascites samples, were collected from 17 patients. These samples were subjected to single-cell RNA sequencing (n = 28) and spatial transcriptomics (n = 3), generating a single-cell landscape comprising 233,986 cells. Furthermore, post-hoc analyses of a phase 1 clinical trial (n = 20, NCT03710265) and immunotherapy cohort (n = 499) within our center were conducted to validate the findings.
Results
Tracing the evolutionary trajectory of epithelial cells unveiled the terminally differentially MUC1+ cancer cells with a high epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition potential, which correlates with poor prognosis. A significant expansion of macrophage infiltrates, which exhibited highest pro-angiogenic activity, was observed in the ascites compared to PT and PM. Besides, higher C1Q+ macrophage infiltrates correlated with significantly lower GZMA+ T-lymphocyte infiltrates in therapeutic failure cases, potentially mediated by the LGALS9-CD45 and SPP1-CD44 ligand-receptor interactions. In the chemoresistant group, intimate interactions between C1Q+ macrophages and fibroblasts through the complement activation pathway were found. In the group demonstrating immunoresistance, heightened TGF-β production activity was detected in MUC1+ cancer cells. Ultimately, post-hoc analyses indicated that co-targeting TGF-β and PDL1 pathways may confer superior clinical benefits than sole anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for GCPM patients.
Conclusions
Our findings elucidated the cellular differentiation trajectories and crucial drug resistance features within PME, facilitating the exploration of effective targets for GCPM treatment.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Peking University Cancer Hospital.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session