Abstract 31P
Background
Pathological complete response (pCR) is the strongest patient-level prognostic factor in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (NAT). Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed to recapitulate the immune-milieu and to anticipate benefit from NAT. We explored correlations between pCR and immune-inflammatory indices such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), granulocyte-stimulating factors (G-CSF) use, all having demonstrated to be prognostic in the metastatic setting.
Methods
We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients who completed NAT with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-522 regimen) from Jan 2022 until Aug 2024, from our single-institution cohort. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the association between pCR and NLR or PLR at baseline (0), at the switch from taxane-to anthracycline-based chemo (5) and at the end of the NAT (8). Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were calculated with alpha set at 0.05.
Results
Of the 43 patients included in the study, 49% were diagnosed with stage IIB, achieving a pCR in 61% of these cases. The OR for the NLR0 was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.57–1.42, p=0.665), for NLR5 was 0.74 (p=0.190) and for NLR8 was 0.86 (p=0.421), indicating no significant predictive value for pCR. Similarly, PLR0 (OR: 0.99, p=0.623) and PLR5 (OR: 0.99, p=0.139) also showed no significant association; the use of G-CSF was not independently prognostic. When examining combined models including G-CSF and NLR values, no statistical significance was observed; the combination of G-CSF and NLR5 yielded an OR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.45–1.16, p=0.184).
Conclusions
Our research evaluated the longitudinal trend of NLR or PLR in the NAT setting. We did not find evidence to support the use of NLR or PLR (at different timepoints) as predictive biomarkers of pCR with NAT in patients with early TNBC, mainly due to the low statistical power. Future studies with larger sample sizes and additional biomarkers may be necessary to identify robust and reliable predictors of treatment response.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
77P - A new prognostic index for patients with advanced BTC treated with cisplatin, gemcitabine and durvalumab
Presenter: MARA PERSANO
Session: Poster Display session
79P - Relevance of combined positive score (CPS) & low-dose immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (GC): A multi-institution analysis
Presenter: Anant Ramaswamy
Session: Poster Display session
80P - Tumor markers evolution in pts treated with TCE and association with radiologic response
Presenter: Constance d'Abrigeon
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Predictive value of inflammatory ratios on the outcome of advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy: A multicentric analysis
Presenter: Aleksandar Popovic
Session: Poster Display session
82P - Predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy efficacy in locally advanced cancer patients: A retrospective analysis based on changes in tumor shrinkage rate and lymphocyte count
Presenter: Zhanjie Zhang
Session: Poster Display session
83P - Effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with and without surgery in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study
Presenter: xuqiang liao
Session: Poster Display session
84P - Safety Of Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors In Older Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Verene Dougoud-Chauvin
Session: Poster Display session
86P - Treatment trajectories and outcome following irAE related hospitalization in metastatic cancer patients
Presenter: Veera Nurmela
Session: Poster Display session
87P - Access to vedolizumab for the management of immune-related colitis (IRC): A United Kingdom study
Presenter: Faye Coe
Session: Poster Display session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session