Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

31P - Peripheral-blood Immune-predictors of pathological complete response in patients with triple-negative breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy

Date

12 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Celeste Santoro

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 24 (suppl_1): 1-16. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100742

Authors

C. Santoro1, C. Valenza2, G. Pellizzari2, G. antonarelli2, D. Trapani3, M. Milano2, E. Munzone2, G. Curigliano2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan/IT
  • 2 IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan/IT
  • 3 IEO - Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141 - Milan/IT

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 31P

Background

Pathological complete response (pCR) is the strongest patient-level prognostic factor in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (NAT). Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed to recapitulate the immune-milieu and to anticipate benefit from NAT. We explored correlations between pCR and immune-inflammatory indices such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), granulocyte-stimulating factors (G-CSF) use, all having demonstrated to be prognostic in the metastatic setting.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients who completed NAT with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-522 regimen) from Jan 2022 until Aug 2024, from our single-institution cohort. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the association between pCR and NLR or PLR at baseline (0), at the switch from taxane-to anthracycline-based chemo (5) and at the end of the NAT (8). Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were calculated with alpha set at 0.05.

Results

Of the 43 patients included in the study, 49% were diagnosed with stage IIB, achieving a pCR in 61% of these cases. The OR for the NLR0 was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.57–1.42, p=0.665), for NLR5 was 0.74 (p=0.190) and for NLR8 was 0.86 (p=0.421), indicating no significant predictive value for pCR. Similarly, PLR0 (OR: 0.99, p=0.623) and PLR5 (OR: 0.99, p=0.139) also showed no significant association; the use of G-CSF was not independently prognostic. When examining combined models including G-CSF and NLR values, no statistical significance was observed; the combination of G-CSF and NLR5 yielded an OR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.45–1.16, p=0.184).

Conclusions

Our research evaluated the longitudinal trend of NLR or PLR in the NAT setting. We did not find evidence to support the use of NLR or PLR (at different timepoints) as predictive biomarkers of pCR with NAT in patients with early TNBC, mainly due to the low statistical power. Future studies with larger sample sizes and additional biomarkers may be necessary to identify robust and reliable predictors of treatment response.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.