Abstract 98P
Background
Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequent and potentially affect every tissue and organ. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced symptomatic myocarditis occurs only in around 1% of ICI-treated patients (pts), but is fatal in 50% of cases.
Methods
Pts undergoing ICI therapy at the Humanitas Cancer Center from May 2021 to June 2024 were prospectively recruited and assigned to three study groups: 1) ICI as monotherapy (Mono) 2) ICI in combination (Combo) 3) history of cardiac disease or at least two cardiological risk factors (Cardio). All pts underwent a complete cardiological assessment comprising clinical visit, 12-lead ECG, and multiparametric cardiac MRI (cMRI) at two time-points: prior initiation of the ICI therapy, and around 8 weeks later. cMRI scans were performed using a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Chi-square, Fisher exact and paired t-test were used to compare groups. Study objectives were detection of subclinical cardiac damage and identification of groups of patients at major risk.
Results
We present data on the first 57 pts enrolled, renal carcinoma (n=21), melanoma (n=16) and NSCLC (n=3) were the most represented tumors; 17 (30%), 20 (35%) and 20 (35%) pts were assigned to the Mono, Combo and Cardio group, respectively. Most pts (50, 88%) were treated with ICI for locally advanced/metastatic disease (34 as first-line therapy, 16 from second-line on), while 7 (12%) as adjuvant therapy. All pts received an anti-PD-1/PD-L1, either as single agent (30, 53%) or in combination, with ICI plus a TKI being the most frequent combinatorial strategy (20; 35%). Overall, the cMRI analysis showed a statistically significant left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction pre- versus post-ICI treatment (p 0.008), with 23 (40%) pts experiencing a loss of more than 3 points of LVEF. No statistically significant differences in LVEF reduction were observed considering the three different groups (p=0.6) or occurrence of any grade non-cardiological irAEs (p=0.7).
Conclusions
Our study showed a statistically significant reduction in LVEF, with more that 3% LVEF loss in a clinically significant proportion of patients (23; 40%), not selected for cardiac history, warranting prospective evaluation to identify pts at higher risk.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AIRC IG 24988.
Disclosure
A. Santoro: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Servier, Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Sanofi, Incyte; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda, BMS, Roche, Abb-Vie, Amgen, Celgene, Servier, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, Sandoz, Eisai, Novartis, Bayer, MSD. M. Simonelli: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Incyte, Cytovia, Glaxo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Glaxo, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Data Monitoring Committee: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Steering Committee: BMS/Celgene; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grant: Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Grant: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract